How about an opinion:

[johnnyg08]

Originally Posted by MrUmpire

Fired coaches want to blame officials?

Most often, the teams that took first and second in the league had the same officials as the team who finished last.

What a crock.

Yep, and when they lose, it wasn't because of the three errors, the walks, the bunt not executed correctly, and the absolute banger that we missed at 1B because F4 bobbled the ball twice, his throw pulled F3 off of the base, and we safe him on the swipe tag which "costed them the game"

I've seen it and heard it a million times.

[yawetag]

Originally Posted by martinapinto

To be fair, Missouri does require the coach to explain a 5 rating (which equates to "not good enough for sub-Varsity level"). Coaches know this, so the lowest they'll go is a 4 rating. After that, they'll just mark the "needs improvement" for all the sections.

I doubt the irony of the system escapes most officials.

[Rich]

Originally Posted by johnnyg08

Yep, and when they lose, it wasn't because of the three errors, the walks, the bunt not executed correctly, and the absolute banger that we missed at 1B because F4 bobbled the ball twice, his throw pulled F3 off of the base, and we safe him on the swipe tag which "costed them the game"

I've seen it and heard it a million times.

The last time I heard something like this was at the end of an 8-run ballgame that eliminated the team from the tournament. I couldn't help but chuckle with my partner as I ignored the coach completely while heading to the car.

[HokieUmp]

Originally Posted by Tim C

Why does there need to be some type of nefarious reason for the OP.

I thought it was a rather mudane topic that would roll over and die quickly.

Not so much, actually.

Was just trying to inject a little levity into a topic that had gone on for a while - won't make that mistake again. If you don't want an army of umpires doing your bidding - good or evil - that's entirely up to you...

Nationally more and more coaches, at the high school level, get fired for their win/loss record. Many times these same coaches complain that their loss of employment was due to poor officials (something that they have no control over).

They have no control over it, and they generally have no way to prove it, either.

It's the way of it - coaches and players will blame the officials for their failings as their first option.

And it's all levels, not just HS. I worked an NABA game Sunday, and as I left the field a player said "Thanks for calling me out there, Blue", referring to a banger at first in the 5th or so. I didn't bother to mention his team had 20 other outs to work with, or that they'd had the lead more than once in the game, or that they went into the bottom of the 7th defending a 1 run lead, and couldn't hold it. No point to it - it was CLEARLY my fault, on that one call, in a 7-6 or 8-7 game.

That's why I said, a few pages ago, that coach input really needs to be minimized, if not outright ignored, since nearly all of their ratings will based on the emotions of winning and losing. Having evaluators from the umpire association itself is ALWAYS the better option. Sure, they might be biased - since umpires are the "third team" - but they won't have the emotional attachments a player or coach would have.

[Tim C]

"If you don't want an army of umpires doing your bidding - good or evil - that's entirely up to you..."

Actually, I have NO IDEA what this statement means.

T

[MD Longhorn]

Originally Posted by Tim C

Actually, I have NO IDEA what this statement means.

T

It's OK, the rest of us do.

[DG]

Originally Posted by mbcrowder

It's OK, the rest of us do.

Count me out of the rest.