The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 17, 2010, 09:31pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 9
Runner hit by batted ball- retroactive call? (Phils/Yanks 6/17)

Hi friends, been retired too long to think this through. Play was meaningless in the scope of the game, but something doesn't smell right to me.

2 outs, bases full. Grounder to short which strikes R2 on the foot (in front of the SS- no doubt what the call *should* be). No call. Two runners cross the plate. Defense runs off the field. U3 and U2 talk briefly, then call in U1 and HPU. After a fairly lengthy discussion, R2 is called out and the inning ends.


Is this a "legal" reversal? I'm thinking this is a "see it, call it" play where any ump who saw the batted ball hit R2 should kill the play immediately?

Thanks for the opinions....
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 17, 2010, 09:41pm
Stop staring at me swan.
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,974
This is a correctable error. Two outs. Don't have to place runners. Dead ball, three outs. Probably didn't look great...but they got it right. If you're not sure on a play like that, they are probably trained to let it happened, talk about it, and if you can get the play right w/o screwing things up more...you get the play right. Sounds good to me.
__________________
It's like Deja Vu all over again
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 17, 2010, 09:49pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 9
thanks..."correctable"....that's the word I couldn't find....been waaaay too long....
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 17, 2010, 11:53pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 755
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnyg08 View Post
This is a correctable error. Two outs. Don't have to place runners. Dead ball, three outs. Probably didn't look great...but they got it right. If you're not sure on a play like that, they are probably trained to let it happened, talk about it, and if you can get the play right w/o screwing things up more...you get the play right. Sounds good to me.
I'm confused on what they weren't sure about. If it was THAT obvious it hit the runner, what were the umpires waiting on?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 18, 2010, 06:20am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 109
I can see them letting the play go on as was stated previously. This is a correctable call and if no call is made, it can be easily corrected.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 18, 2010, 06:24am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 9
My take is that not one of them actually saw it. Here's the way I see that discussion playing out:

U2: Did you see it hit the runner??
U3: Nope. Lets ask the other guys. HEY GUYS COME HERE.....
U2: Did either of you see it hit the runner?
U1: Nope. I was moving to get the play at first.
HP: Nope. I woulda called it if I saw it.
U2: Well, the ball went 3 feet wide of the shortstop who was poised to make a play.
U1: And the entire defense just ran to the dugout as soon as it happened.
HP: So everybody in the place thinks the ball hit him except us.
U2: Yep. And the team on offense is up 6 runs in the ninth inning.
U3: And the team on defense in the home team.
HP: So if we don't make the call these fans may go ballistic.
U1: And if we do make the call, the offensive team probably won't argue all that much.
U2: Can we legally correct the call?
HP: Who cares. The call won't effect the outcome of the game and I wanna get out of here alive.

U2 (leaving the huddle): OOOOOOUUUUUUUUTTTTTTT !!!!!!

Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 18, 2010, 07:46am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,136
According to a blurb in the local fishwrap, there was some other reversal yesterday. R2, low liner to short. U2 calls it a catch, and F6 steps on second to appeal R2 leaving early. Inning ends, teams change sides, umpires huddle. Determine it wasn't a catch, call BR out and put R2 at third (saying that's the likely outcome if "no catch" had been called in the first place). Make teams switch again. Next batter lines out to officially end the inning.

Lah me.

It's a brave new world.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 18, 2010, 07:59am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: West of Atlanta, GA
Posts: 381
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins View Post
According to a blurb in the local fishwrap, there was some other reversal yesterday. R2, low liner to short. U2 calls it a catch, and F6 steps on second to appeal R2 leaving early. Inning ends, teams change sides, umpires huddle. Determine it wasn't a catch, call BR out and put R2 at third (saying that's the likely outcome if "no catch" had been called in the first place). Make teams switch again. Next batter lines out to officially end the inning.

Lah me.

It's a brave new world.
Here's your video.

http://houston.astros.mlb.com/news/a...=.jsp&c_id=hou
__________________
Question everything until you get an irrefutable or understandable answer...Don't settle for "That's Just the Way it is"

Last edited by GA Umpire; Fri Jun 18, 2010 at 08:20am.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 18, 2010, 08:07am
Stop staring at me swan.
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,974
Quote:
Originally Posted by GA Umpire View Post
That link isn't working
__________________
It's like Deja Vu all over again
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 18, 2010, 08:20am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: West of Atlanta, GA
Posts: 381
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnyg08 View Post
That link isn't working
Didn't realize the abbreviation was done when I copied it from another site. I have corrected it.
__________________
Question everything until you get an irrefutable or understandable answer...Don't settle for "That's Just the Way it is"
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 18, 2010, 08:30am
Stop staring at me swan.
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,974
Interesting play for sure. They had to assume that F6 would make the play successfully at F3, which is pretty fair at the MLB level. They had to give the defense an out somewhere. It is a new world of umpiring out there, that's for sure. For the most part, I think it's a good thing.
__________________
It's like Deja Vu all over again
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Runner hit by batted ball / need help rbmartin Baseball 1 Thu May 10, 2007 05:49pm
Runner hit by batted ball... ElPanadero Baseball 5 Sat Apr 01, 2006 12:54am
Runner hit by batted ball chuck chopper Baseball 5 Thu Jun 16, 2005 05:11pm
Runner hit by batted ball, scoring runner, batter wfwbb Baseball 12 Sat Jul 17, 2004 03:12pm
Runner Hit By Batted Ball DFM7 Baseball 16 Wed Jun 30, 2004 01:37pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:15pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1