![]() |
|
|||
|
Quote:
PU: "Mo, I got INT on R3." MO: "What did he do?" PU: "He interfered with the throw." MO: "That's my call, PU. What did he do?" PU: "You couldn't see the INT." MO: "You're right, I didn't see it. Are you sure you had INT?" PU: "Yes MO I did." What is MO to do? He is the BU; in Fed by rule, if both umpires disagree, then the UIC's decision stands. MO can tell the PU he is an idiot, or tell him gently there was no INT, or offer him $25 to change his mind. But if the PU had INT, he's not changing his mind on the judgment call at this point, is he? My guess is that MO knows he has no chance to change PU's mind, so he lets it go. He may well have known he has nowhere to go to change things. And to push it is to really mess the game up. He can't overrule him. MO, sorry for you and your partner's ignorance. 99% for you. Maybe next time try to change things, no matter how hopeless it is. Last edited by jkumpire; Thu May 13, 2010 at 10:24pm. |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| First century in a while | Rich | Basketball | 3 | Fri Jan 22, 2010 12:37am |
| Mechanics for the 21st Century? | Mike Goble | Baseball | 1 | Sun Feb 27, 2005 02:40pm |
| ASA OBS call then no call leads to ejection | DaveASA/FED | Softball | 28 | Mon Jul 12, 2004 03:52pm |
| To call or not to call foul ball | DaveASA/FED | Softball | 11 | Thu Jun 24, 2004 11:47am |
| More Pacers/Pistons call/no call | OverAndBack | Basketball | 36 | Thu Jun 03, 2004 07:01pm |