(FED) THE Dumbest ...

[TheShadowKnows]

Originally Posted by HokieUmp

I can't speak to the book to which you're referring, since I haven't seen it or its cover, or any of that. And I'm not really trying to start a p155ing contest, either. But assuming your question was more than rhetorical, I'll answer it.

You certainly are expressing an opinion, and it's still allowed in America. But from my reading of this thread, and other postings elsewhere, is that you might not be as unbiased as you think you are (see: News, Fox). What I've read over time is that you seem to have issues, unresolved or otherwise, with Jim Evans, and have to put in little digs here and there. That, in turn, might be why people respond to your posts as they do.

Nice Shot at Fox News. Let me guess you get all the truth from MSNBC and CNN

[HokieUmp]

Originally Posted by TheShadowKnows

Nice Shot at Fox News.

(deleted)

(And, look, realize where I come from on this. Everyone is biased - everyone.

(deleted)

And I would happily discuss subjects like this here, but I'm betting the over/under on Bob killing this post is 28.5 hours.

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by HokieUmp

(deleted)

(And, look, realize where I come from on this. Everyone is biased - everyone.

(deleted)

And I would happily discuss subjects like this here, but I'm betting the over/under on Bob killing this post is 28.5 hours.

Under. Drop it (all of us).

[TheShadowKnows]

Good point, I just edited my reply, but it was gone before I got done. Good Move

[HokieUmp]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

Under.

Nuts! I hadn't even gotten to the bookie yet!

[Kevin Finnerty]

Okay, here goes:

Everything about the Jim Evans work is totally acceptable, no matter what the price! And anything Jim does or says is more than enough for me to just accept and embrace. When it comes to standards, let's just set them aside when it comes to Jim, because that material is of immeasurable value.

How's that?