The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sat Aug 03, 2002, 01:14am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 40
Send a message via AIM to Gold_Spark Send a message via Yahoo to Gold_Spark
Actually . . . just a confirmation from you guys.

This ruling concerns a runner running 3 feet off the baseline to avoid the tag.

The situation is so. The catcher is RECEIVING (ball is in flight) the ball several feet up the third base line and the runner moves more then 3 foot in distance off the baseline.

From there, the runner continues directly to home where the catcher is unable to make the tag.

My understanding is as follows. The baserunner may not run 3 foot away from a direct line between himself and the base he is proceeding to in order to avoid a tag. However, considering the catcher did NOT have the ball at the time the runner moved out . . . the runner merely re-established his baseline.

Could I get some response to this?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sat Aug 03, 2002, 01:24am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 4,222
Despite the rule book defining the runner's baseline as a direct path between the bases (one of several admitted errors in the book) you've got the essence of the rule.

And, you've answered your own question, more or less.

Did the runner leave the baseline by more than 3' to avoid a tag?

Yes? He's out.

No? He's not out.

On what do we base this decision? Your judgement.

From your description it sounds to me like the runner left the baseline to avoid colliding with the catcher who had not yet received the ball, thus could not be attempting a tag. Smart move. Good call.

Now then, if the catcher received the ball and attempted a swipe tag as the runner ran out of the baseline (despite your resistance, two seemingly simultaneous events) what would you have?

GB
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sat Aug 03, 2002, 09:52am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 201
The crux of it is: Was he moving out of the baseline to avoid the tag or avoid colliding with the catcher? If avoiding the tag, he's out. If avoiding the collision, he's safe. Your call.
__________________
David A. Brand
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sat Aug 03, 2002, 10:44am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 40
Send a message via AIM to Gold_Spark Send a message via Yahoo to Gold_Spark
It was tough . . .

So it all boils down to this mainly.

If the catcher did not have the ball when the runner moved out of baseline . . . the runner isn't out?

And if he does have the ball as the runner moves out of baseline . . . the runner IS out?

Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sat Aug 03, 2002, 01:24pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 79
Send a message via AIM to blarson
It sounds like you got the handle on this Sparky.

Also keep in mind that if the catcher did not have to be in that position to field the ball, you potentially have an obstruction call. If the runner had to veer around F2, and had time to get around him before the ball got there, I more than likely have OBS on this.

bob
__________________
Bob L
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:11pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1