The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Tue Nov 10, 2009, 07:51pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,057
Send a message via Yahoo to UmpJM
Cool

Thanks to all who chose to respond.

My post here was prompted by a discussion on another thread with a gentleman who was certain that it was grounds for forfeit to not have properly marked balls available.

I had never heard that before and disagreed.

I was curious how it was handled in different parts of the country. Between the two threads, 20 different posters took a position (including me).

4 said you can't play without them. Only one that it was grounds for a forfeit. The other 3 said they'd have/find a way to get marked balls.

Everybody else said "play", with some suggesting "file a report". 2 of the "don't play" umpires are from the LA area, &, I suspect, may belong to the same association. Another from NC & one from MN.

The FED Interpretation I posted above I found in the BRD. The BRD references the NFHS News, 3/99 #20. Apparently, this was in anticipation of the "Mark" requirement entering the rule book in 2000.

Sounds to me like the "official" FED position is, play the game, report it. Makes perfect sense to me.

JM
__________________
Finally, be courteous, impartial and firm, and so compel respect from all.
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue Nov 10, 2009, 08:04pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Chasing the dream
Posts: 433
Quote:
Originally Posted by UmpJM (nee CoachJM) View Post

Sounds to me like the "official" FED position is, play the game, report it. Makes perfect sense to me.

JM
FED, at least as represented by Elliot Hopkins, agrees with you. It's too bad some umpires and some assigners actually put a logo above the game. Since relocating to Southern California I'ver run into some real anal types, but I haven't had the experience with an assigner that Larry has had.

Last edited by Ump153; Tue Nov 10, 2009 at 10:43pm.
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 11, 2009, 01:46pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,729
Nope

Quote:
"I believe this all stems from Nike attaining a contract with NFHS to supply baseballs for all (legal) NFHS games."
That statement is probably incorrect.

Oregon plays with the Classic Wilson A1010.

It is stamped with both the OSAA Logo and the NFHS Logo.

Wilson has been strong sponsor of Oregon High School Athletics for many, many years.
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 11, 2009, 01:57pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,280
In Missouri, most teams use Diamond baseballs in the spring for FED games.

If I showed up to a game and the home team didn't have FED-stamped baseballs, I would play the game and report it to the assigner and state. I think that is how most others here would handle it as well.

You know it's slow when we're discussing stamps on baseballs.
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 11, 2009, 07:26am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by UmpJM (nee CoachJM) View Post

Sounds to me like the "official" FED position is, play the game, report it. Makes perfect sense to me.

JM
In Ohio, the state baseball philosophy is: "do what you can to get the game in." Between bad weather, fields that aren't ready, and other factors beyond our control, ignoring the mark on the baseball is something clearly within our power.

Consistent with that principle, we, too, are instructed to play the game and report the infraction. Most umpires I know do at least half of that.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 11, 2009, 07:43am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 1,428
Our contract with the high schools requires line-up cards to be typed. Arguably, a card generated by a computer and a printer is not typed (not that I see many of those anyway). Ergo, under our present contract, there has never been a legally-played game.
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 12, 2009, 06:55am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 755
Quote:
Originally Posted by dash_riprock View Post
Our contract with the high schools requires line-up cards to be typed. Arguably, a card generated by a computer and a printer is not typed (not that I see many of those anyway). Ergo, under our present contract, there has never been a legally-played game.
I would be willing to bet that someone typed the names into the lineup card before printing it.
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 11, 2009, 12:53pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: At the base of the mountains
Posts: 377
I believe this all stems from Nike attaining a contract with NFHS to supply baseballs for all (legal) NFHS games. If your that anal, it's simple. Hey coach the baseball's are not official Nike/Fed balls. Do you have a problem playing without them, if the answer is no, then your next statement should be, great, however there will be no protest over the game because of the ball. Why make the job more difficult. The team supplying the baseballs are most likely trying to save a buck, let em, my guess is they meet the same standard without the stamp. Ignore it, play the damn game.
__________________
Its' not a matter of being right or wrong, it's a matter of working hard to get it right.
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 11, 2009, 02:32pm
M.A.S.H.
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,030
Quote:
Originally Posted by justanotherblue View Post
I believe this all stems from Nike attaining a contract with NFHS to supply baseballs for all (legal) NFHS games.
Not true in Illinois. The IHSA has a new contract with Baden to use their baseballs in their State Series.
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 11, 2009, 06:00pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: At the base of the mountains
Posts: 377
Could just be Nevada then, I was under the impression it was a fed thing, obviously I'm wrong..not the first time, won't be the last.
__________________
Its' not a matter of being right or wrong, it's a matter of working hard to get it right.
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 11, 2009, 06:14pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,895
I've seen Rawlings, Wilson, Diamond, Pro 9 and Champro but not Baden or Nike. Thankfully we don't have to use only one brand. Good grief.
Closed Thread

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ABC's "Nightline" examines "worst calls ever" tonight pizanno Basketball 27 Fri Jul 04, 2008 06:08am
"Hideout" Play--Legal or Not? reff4e Football 10 Mon Nov 26, 2007 08:28pm
New "AP Legal Touch" Rule/Different Interpretation BayStateRef Basketball 142 Wed Jul 18, 2007 10:53pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:18am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1