![]() |
|
|
|
|||
|
Upon further review, I'd have to agree the batter-runner got back into the running lane by the time he and the throw got to first (and PU was checking it out) and that the throw caused the fielder, who was set up for a foul-side throw, to pull his foot. Good call, blue, and exciting baseball.
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
But, as an academic exericise, let's say he did not. Would you consider a lane violation in that case - even if the ball doesn't hit the batter-runner? David Emerling Memphis, TN Last edited by David Emerling; Tue Oct 13, 2009 at 12:40am. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
No interference on an avoid-collision theory, because that theory is not an accepted interpretation, as pointed out by Mr. Umpire back in post #12. Similar to a F6 who backs off a ground ball to avoid contact with a R2. No neighborhood-play out call because the throw caused the pulled foot. But I thought, contrary to Mr. Umpire, that the neighborhood-play theory could apply at first base, assuming a high-quality throw, in order to avoid F3's foot getting stepped on by BR. At the risk of hijacking the thread, can I get some yays or nays on this? |
|
|||
|
I will go with the nay on this one, no neighborhoods at 1b.
|
|
|||
|
I suppose I could dream up a scenario where we have a qulaity throw to F3 and he pulls foot to avoid collision, but its one in a million.
So yay, we could have a neighborhood play at first, but nay 99.9% of the time. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Running Lane | mccann | Softball | 17 | Mon Oct 03, 2016 01:29pm |
| 30' Running Lane | bobbrix | Softball | 16 | Mon Mar 08, 2004 12:20am |
| ASA - running lane violation with a walk | Dakota | Softball | 34 | Thu Sep 25, 2003 09:57am |
| running lane violation | Rachel | Softball | 4 | Thu Jul 10, 2003 09:03pm |
| Running Lane | Bandit | Softball | 2 | Wed Apr 11, 2001 10:27am |