|
Mon Oct 12, 2009, 02:00pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
Running lane violation????
 If the 1st baseman had been on the foul side of first, the throw probably should have been easier for the ump to call? If the pitcher had hit the runner in the back, the call should have been "OUT" for a running lane violation. As it happened, the batter/runner was not hit and the pitcher had to throw over top of the runner. Result: safe! As far as the batter being hit in the knee with the ball, just one of those things NO ONE saw!  The best team won that night & that series.
__________________
UMP64 Thoes who cannot remember the past, are condemned to repeat it! 
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Running Lane | mccann | Softball | 17 | Mon Oct 03, 2016 01:29pm |
| 30' Running Lane | bobbrix | Softball | 16 | Mon Mar 08, 2004 12:20am |
| ASA - running lane violation with a walk | Dakota | Softball | 34 | Thu Sep 25, 2003 09:57am |
| running lane violation | Rachel | Softball | 4 | Thu Jul 10, 2003 09:03pm |
| Running Lane | Bandit | Softball | 2 | Wed Apr 11, 2001 10:27am |
Threaded Mode
