Running lane violation?

[Rich]

Originally Posted by David Emerling

I'm wondering if anybody had any opinions about the controversial play that occurred in game #3 of the Rockies/Phillies NLDS series.

Here's the play:
Umps admit missed call on Utley hit | MLB.com: News

Of course, the controversy seemed to be whether the batted ball hit the batter while in the box (which it clearly did) -and- whether F3 had pulled his foot on the throw (not quite so clear).

But I was surprised there was no lane violation discussion. I know at the MLB level they are not very quick to call this, especially on margin throws.

What if this were a NFHS game. Would you have called it then? Do you think the ball needed to hit the runner to be a violation? In your opinion, was the throw off the mark because the runner was out of the lane? Or, was the runner out of the lane?

Just interested in some opinions on that play.

David Emerling
Memphis, TN

Nope. The throw was not put there, IMO, because of the location of the runner.

I think it's unfortunate, but understood why the ball hitting Utley was missed. I also think Kulpa made a great call at first. Stop action, the foot was clearly off the bag and it was a result of moving for the throw, so why give anything there?