out of the batters box

[mikebran]

Another classic and oft repeated question. And a chapter in the Excrement Covered Stick book.

I ain't buying some of the other analysis, regardless of the physics.

On this play, if ANY part of that batter is still in the batters box, then this is a FOUL BALL. Kill it, back to bat. Why try to play surveyer or need to triangulate.

Oh look a stick! This ends covered in DOO, this end is clean! What ever should I do?

And if you rule that the batter had completely LEFT the box and is then hit by batted ball in fair territory, you will kill this play, rule him out, and return other runners.

Originally Posted by _Bruno_

B1 bunts the ball down the first base line. as he starts off for first, the ball bounces straight up and hits the batter.

when is a player out of the batters box, so he could be called out instead of a foul ball ?

when one foot, completely outside the box, touches the ground ?!

regards

[dash_riprock]

Originally Posted by mikebran

Oh look a stick! This ends covered in DOO, this end is clean! What ever should I do?

Thank you. Unless he is OBVIOUSLY way out of the box, call it foul and sell the crap out of it.

[UMP25]

No need to split frickin' hairs on a play like this.

[ManInBlue]

Who's splitting hairs? Your initial comment said call it based on where X part of his body is when it gets hit. That's incorrect and was pointed out by mike and dash.

[UMP25]

Originally Posted by ManInBlue

Who's splitting hairs? Your initial comment said call it based on where X part of his body is when it gets hit. That's incorrect and was pointed out by mike and dash.

No it's not incorrect, and my comment about splitting hairs was referring to what the poster earlier had said, not the OP.

[UmpTTS43]

I understand avoiding the brown end of the stick. However, when it is obvious the batter is out of the box and is hit with a fair ball, I use Jim Evans' interpretation.

[ManInBlue]

[QUOTE=UMP25;602527]No it's not incorrect,QUOTE]


I'm not arguing about it - yours are the only posts that say anything about where some given part of the body is when that part of the body gets hit. Nothing in the rule book says anything about that. It breaks down when a batter is no longer in the batter's box, period.

[UMP25]

Except that explanation refers to when he hits an illegally batted ball and how to correctly interpret "out of the batter's box." For batter interference when he hits the ball fair and the ball hits him in fair territory, there's nothing said about being in or out of the box. In fact, let's take a look at the very succint wording of the rule:

6.05 - A batter is out when:

(g) His fair ball touches him before touching a fielder

Note that it says "his fair ball." When a batter hits a ball that contacts him in the batter's box, we, by official interpretation, rule it a foul ball. So how can this both be a foul ball and, according to what you say JE says, also be a fair ball/batter's out? It can't.

The word I received from official sources was as I explained earlier. If his fair batted ball hits him in the box, it's a foul ball; if it hits him outside the box, it's interference, dead, etc. When I double-checked on the in the box/out of the box explanation, I was told, "wherever that part of his body was when hit determines whether he is out or if it is a foul ball."

[SAump]

But I would not be splitting hairs if I do point out that those words do matter if one were to look up the exact definition of a fair or foul batted ball.

The correct ruling regards a batted ball redirecting from the ground into the B/R or B/R's bat. It is ruled a foul ball just prior to hitting the B/R outside of the batter's box in these situations. This is the case of the swinging shot directly into the B/R's lower left leg while over fair territory.

The B/R is ruled out much more often for running into a fair "bunted" ball bounding in front of the plate. The batter's box is not a refuge and He does not have the right to a direct path to the nearest base through the bounding baseball. The runner must avoid contact with the batted ball. The same ruling would apply to any runner contacting a baseball while over fair territory.

[SanDiegoSteve]

Originally Posted by mikebran

Another classic and oft repeated question. And a chapter in the Excrement Covered Stick book.

I ain't buying some of the other analysis, regardless of the physics.

On this play, if ANY part of that batter is still in the batters box, then this is a FOUL BALL. Kill it, back to bat. Why try to play surveyer or need to triangulate.

Oh look a stick! This ends covered in DOO, this end is clean! What ever should I do?

And if you rule that the batter had completely LEFT the box and is then hit by batted ball in fair territory, you will kill this play, rule him out, and return other runners.

Very funny post. And accurate!!! See, flowerboy, I doo have a sense of humor!