The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 11, 2009, 03:19pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,226
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron View Post
I disagree. The distinction between retouch and missed base appeals has nothing to do with how obvious the appeal is.

The two appeals are governed by different rules. 7.08(d) and 7.10(a) for retouch appeals, and 7.10(b) and 7.10(d) for missed base appeals.

Especially extending 7.10(d) to all bases makes a difference since it includes the expression "makes no attempt to return." That expression does not appear in the rule for retouch appeals.
So in the play discussed in the following thread (Tigers vs Injuns 5-1-09 Laz Diaz? no-call), would you call this an "unmistakable" appeal by the defense?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 11, 2009, 06:47pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by bossman72 View Post
So in the play discussed in the following thread (Tigers vs Injuns 5-1-09 Laz Diaz? no-call), would you call this an "unmistakable" appeal by the defense?
Yes, though we concluded in that thread that the appeal was not properly constituted for a different reason.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 11, 2009, 08:10pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,226
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron View Post
Yes, though we concluded in that thread that the appeal was not properly constituted for a different reason.
Ok, i see what you're saying.

I read another thread mentioned in the Laz Diaz thread which also confirmed that if the D does something 'unmistakable' that you should award the appeal and call him out.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue May 12, 2009, 06:50am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by bossman72 View Post
Ok, i see what you're saying.

I read another thread mentioned in the Laz Diaz thread which also confirmed that if the D does something 'unmistakable' that you should award the appeal and call him out.
Yeah, I think some people learn about that word 'unmistakable' in the rule and immediately put too much weight on it. Especially as you go up to HS varsity and beyond, these kids know the game pretty well. When everyone's shouting "he missed third! he missed third!" and the ball comes into F5 standing on the base, I regard that as pretty unmistakable.

Notice also that the rule does NOT require players to verbalize their appeal. An appeal can be unmistakable without anyone uttering a word. Context can make words necessary (for instance, if 2 runners passed a base, and we need to know which runner is appealed), but the rule does not.

OTOH, players and coaches think that they have to request time, give the ball to the pitcher, and have him throw to the base for a simple retouch appeal, but still...
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cubs v Mariners Armadillo_Blue Baseball 2 Mon Mar 23, 2009 12:12pm
Mets v Mariners kcg NC2Ablu Baseball 32 Fri Jun 27, 2008 06:11pm
First base play Seattle Mariners rainmaker Baseball 29 Tue Aug 14, 2007 06:26am
Mariners-Angels DTS kicked by BR whitecane Baseball 19 Fri Aug 03, 2007 11:23pm
Angels-Twins 8/29 chuckfan1 Baseball 2 Thu Sep 02, 2004 11:33am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:41am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1