![]() |
|
|
|||
If you made that call, and I was your partner, I would have no problem backing you up on it. Yes, you can't not call it JUST because he made it look worse, but contact is not automatic OBS either. My judgment would be it's nothing, because the runner had a clear path directly to 2nd base, i.e., he was not obstructed, but instead of taking that path, he chose to run into the fielder. In other words, he was obstructed by his own act, not the fielder's.
|
|
|||
Reyes only impeded him because Victorino initiated the contact into Reyes...I'd be interested to see how the crew was evaluated on this call...only because I'm curious not because I really care one way or another.
__________________
It's like Deja Vu all over again |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Rich Ives Different does not equate to wrong |
|
|||
Just like umpires are taught to sell their calls when necessary, Victorrino did a good job of selling the obstruction. Give him his due. When you see this in real time from the angle he had and only see it that once, it is very reasonable to make the call he did. When he got to the locker room and reviewed it maybe he had a different opinion of the play. I'd have no problem backing my partner if he made that call or if he made it the other way (a nothing).
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Phillies - Brewers Interference | SRW | Softball | 14 | Tue Oct 07, 2008 04:56pm |
Ball 5 Sunday night Phillies Mets | gordon30307 | Baseball | 29 | Fri Aug 29, 2008 07:51am |
Obstruction in Giants/Phillies game | Toadman15241 | Baseball | 10 | Tue May 08, 2007 07:47am |
Phillies & Braves, 7/11 | mrm21711 | Baseball | 3 | Mon Jul 12, 2004 10:11am |
Obstruction Call | oppool | Softball | 12 | Wed Feb 06, 2002 07:37pm |