The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 08, 2009, 09:22am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: illinois
Posts: 251
Obstruction... His path was impeded. Yes he exaggerated it, but it was impeded.
Good call..... (cant not call it just because he made it look worse than it was)
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 08, 2009, 10:19am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 1,428
Quote:
Originally Posted by umpjong View Post
Obstruction... His path was impeded. Yes he exaggerated it, but it was impeded.
Good call..... (cant not call it just because he made it look worse than it was)
If you made that call, and I was your partner, I would have no problem backing you up on it. Yes, you can't not call it JUST because he made it look worse, but contact is not automatic OBS either. My judgment would be it's nothing, because the runner had a clear path directly to 2nd base, i.e., he was not obstructed, but instead of taking that path, he chose to run into the fielder. In other words, he was obstructed by his own act, not the fielder's.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 08, 2009, 10:29am
Stop staring at me swan.
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,974
Reyes only impeded him because Victorino initiated the contact into Reyes...I'd be interested to see how the crew was evaluated on this call...only because I'm curious not because I really care one way or another.
__________________
It's like Deja Vu all over again
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 08, 2009, 10:55am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by dash_riprock View Post
If you made that call, and I was your partner, I would have no problem backing you up on it. Yes, you can't not call it JUST because he made it look worse, but contact is not automatic OBS either. My judgment would be it's nothing, because the runner had a clear path directly to 2nd base, i.e., he was not obstructed, but instead of taking that path, he chose to run into the fielder. In other words, he was obstructed by his own act, not the fielder's.
But isn't a runner allowed to take whatever path he chooses?
__________________
Rich Ives
Different does not equate to wrong
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 08, 2009, 11:02am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NY state
Posts: 1,504
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Ives View Post
But isn't a runner allowed to take whatever path he chooses?
No.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 08, 2009, 02:04pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Seattle WA
Posts: 78
Just like umpires are taught to sell their calls when necessary, Victorrino did a good job of selling the obstruction. Give him his due. When you see this in real time from the angle he had and only see it that once, it is very reasonable to make the call he did. When he got to the locker room and reviewed it maybe he had a different opinion of the play. I'd have no problem backing my partner if he made that call or if he made it the other way (a nothing).
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Phillies - Brewers Interference SRW Softball 14 Tue Oct 07, 2008 04:56pm
Ball 5 Sunday night Phillies Mets gordon30307 Baseball 29 Fri Aug 29, 2008 07:51am
Obstruction in Giants/Phillies game Toadman15241 Baseball 10 Tue May 08, 2007 07:47am
Phillies & Braves, 7/11 mrm21711 Baseball 3 Mon Jul 12, 2004 10:11am
Obstruction Call oppool Softball 12 Wed Feb 06, 2002 07:37pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:38am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1