Batting out of order

[UmpJM]

Mike51,

That's an "unannounced sub". If the sub had eligibility to enter and had not earlier batted in a different spot in the order, it's perfectly legal.

JM

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by UmpJM (nee CoachJM)

Mike51,

That's an "unannounced sub". If the sub had eligibility to enter and had not earlier batted in a different spot in the order, it's perfectly legal.

JM

And, even if he was not eligible to enter, it's still a sub. Under OBR (per the OP), the hit stands, the original player is out of the game, and the illegal sub is removed from base, a legal sub is put in.

[bossman72]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

And, even if he was not eligible to enter, it's still a sub. Under OBR (per the OP), the hit stands, the original player is out of the game, and the illegal sub is removed from base, a legal sub is put in.

This is one of the very few Evans interpretations that I do not agree with. I follow the Roder - J/R interp for this situation.

[johnnyg08]

Originally Posted by bossman72

This is one of the very few Evans interpretations that I do not agree with. I follow the Roder - J/R interp for this situation.

This is not in response to the OP? Correct?

[DG]

Originally Posted by bossman72

This is one of the very few Evans interpretations that I do not agree with. I follow the Roder - J/R interp for this situation.

Would like more info on diff between JEA and J/R. I would be inclined to go with Evans.

[johnnyg08]

Evans is working on his new Annotated...looking forward to that

[DG]

Originally Posted by johnnyg08

Evans is working on his new Annotated...looking forward to that

Did not know but will buy if not arm and a leg cost.

[UMP25]

You mean like his old $75 one?

[bossman72]

Originally Posted by DG

Would like more info on diff between JEA and J/R. I would be inclined to go with Evans.

Ok let's use an example play:

R1, R2. An illegal sub enters the game and hits a bases clearing double. It is then discovered by the umpires that he is an illegal sub:

Roder's ruling: Call out the illegal sub and eject him. Return R1 and R2. The original player subbed for cannot re-enter.

Evan's ruling: The play stands despite the actions of the illegal sub. Both runs score. The illegal sub is ejected (not called out) and is replaced on base with a new sub.

[UMP25]

I'm finding it difficult to understand the rationale behind the J/R interpretation insofar as calling the guy out. Now, maybe because I'm thinking along the lines of an unreported sub, which is different, or maybe because it's just late and I should be in bed.

[johnnyg08]

Originally Posted by UMP25

I'm finding it difficult to understand the rationale behind the J/R interpretation insofar as calling the guy out. Now, maybe because I'm thinking along the lines of an unreported sub, which is different, or maybe because it's just late and I should be in bed.

an unreported sub isn't necessarily an illegal sub correct?

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by bossman72

Roder's ruling: Call out the illegal sub and eject him. Return R1 and R2. The original player subbed for cannot re-enter.

What is Roder's basis for this ruling?

[bossman72]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

What is Roder's basis for this ruling?

Roder says there is no rule covering what happens if there is an illegal sub, so there should be a "punishment that fits the crime" essentially.

I like Roder's penalty personally since it's fair. Maybe ignore the "out" but still eject and put runners back.