The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jun 10, 2002, 01:33pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 3
Recent rules notes from Williamsport

Our League President was just discussing this a couple of weeks ago. He mentioned that he had received a notice from LL Headquarters on this subject.

If I recall, they specified that a player must only slide/avoid if the fielder HAS possession of the ball at the time of contact. So, in this case the player would not have had to slide/avoid

However, for purposes of ruling on interference, the usual "in the act of fielding" standard still applies. The runner could be out for interference if the ball was close enough to the catcher to be in the act.

As for ejection, since the boy didn't have to slide/avoid the ruling should be train wreck and I don't see how any intentional contact could be called and therefore ejection is crazy. This is something that would be appealed in our league since ejection means automatic 1 game suspension.

I would have called the boy out for interference and that's it.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:55pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1