Catch/No Catch

[SanDiegoSteve]

Originally Posted by MrUmpire

Perhaps you are confusing a catch of a batted ball with this play?

No, what I meant was trapped against his body with his hand. He was bobbling the ball, then trapped it against his chest. He never stated what he trapped the ball against his chest with. I just naturally figured (not assumed) that he was bobbling the ball, then at the last second trapped it between his glove or hand and his body. Which would be an out.

Perhaps we need the complete story. It seems like we are missing information.

[bobbybanaduck]

Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve

No, what I meant was trapped against his body with his hand. He was bobbling the ball, then trapped it against his chest. He never stated what he trapped the ball against his chest with. I just naturally figured (not assumed) that he was bobbling the ball, then at the last second trapped it between his glove or hand and his body. Which would be an out.

Perhaps we need the complete story. It seems like we are missing information.

you're not going to win this argument, sir.

[ozzy6900]

I've said it for the past 2 years and I will say it again. Today's umpires are going BS over calling abandonment for some reason! I am beginning to think that making this call makes them feel like they are real umpires..... or maybe it's just an orgasm!

I've been officiating for almost 30 years and I have never made this call or heard a partner make it. Yet since around 2006, we have been getting post after post about this call. Has something changed or are we being over-run by Smitties?

[charliej47]

IT was F! that 'trapped' the ball. Why he went after it and did not let F3 have it I don't know. At the last High School clinic I attended it was recommended that we make such calls. In 47 years of umpiring I have maybe called it 2 or 3 times and it has always been for young players. One of the regional clinics I went to they wanted us to be more vocal in our calls. I normally don't say much but am trying to accommodate the leagues requests.

[jicecone]

Just thinking out loud here.

In you original post you were doing a summer U12 game (last year)and made this call. Now when questioned about why the heck you would even go there, (especially with 47 yrs experience), you tell us that your HS association asked that these calls be made????????????

Am I missing something here.????????????????

[charliej47]

Originally Posted by jicecone

Just thinking out loud here.

In you original post you were doing a summer U12 game (last year)and made this call. Now when questioned about why the heck you would even go there, (especially with 47 yrs experience), you tell us that your HS association asked that these calls be made????????????

Am I missing something here.????????????????

I was adding information. It was a summer u12 game. I am stating that the last High School clinic I went to we were ask to make our calls more verbal such as this one.

[SanDiegoSteve]

Originally Posted by bobbybanaduck

you're not going to win this argument, sir.

What argument? I'm not arguing. If a fielder traps the ball against his body with his hand or glove, and touches the base before the runner on a force, it's an out. No argument to be had.

[UmpJM]

Steve,

Maybe you are using the word "trap" differently than I would.

If the fielder does not have secure possession of the ball in his hand or glove at the time of the tag, it's not a legal tag.

If he is using some other body part (e.g., his chest) to maintain possession of the ball, and would lose possession without it, he has not met the criteria for a tag (or a catch, for that matter).

JM

[SanDiegoSteve]

Originally Posted by UmpJM (nee CoachJM)

Steve,

Maybe you are using the word "trap" differently than I would.

If the fielder does not have secure possession of the ball in his hand or glove at the time of the tag, it's not a legal tag.

If he is using some other body part (e.g., his chest) to maintain possession of the ball, and would lose possession without it, he has not met the criteria for a tag (or a catch, for that matter).

JM

I am equating it to a low throw in the dirt that F3 "traps" between his glove and the ground. If he comes up with the ball in his glove, it's an out. If the ball gets left on the ground, it's not an out. Same logic applies: If he "traps" (Charlie's word) the ball against his chest with his hand or glove (my scenario) and then shows the umpire the ball in his hand or glove after pulling it away from his body (much like the ground in the first scenario), then he has proven possession. If the ball falls to the ground instead, then it is not an out, and I give the emphatic safe signal followed by the "double dribble" signal, signifying the bobbled ball. What I was saying is that not enough info was given to make a blanket statement that the out wasn't recorded at the base originally, with no "abandonment" or "disertion" or any other manufactured situation, just a plain-old force.

[MrUmpire]

Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve

If the ball falls to the ground instead, then it is not an out, and I give the emphatic safe signal followed by the "double dribble" signal, signifying the bobbled ball.

Not the same signal.

Double dribble signal: plams down.
Bobbled ball signal: palms up.

[SanDiegoSteve]

Originally Posted by MrUmpire

Not the same signal.

Double dribble signal: plams down.
Bobbled ball signal: palms up.

Your right! good catch. I had to do both just now to catch that myself!

[SAump]

Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve

I am equating it to a low throw in the dirt that F3 "traps" between his glove and the ground. If he comes up with the ball in his glove, it's an out. If the ball gets left on the ground, it's not an out.

Ball in the dirt within reach of F3. F3 "traps" the ball between his hand or glove and the ground before B/R touches 1B. F3 hasn't clearly demonstrated possession by "lifting" the ball off the ground when B/R touches 1B.

Safe or out? "If he comes up with the ball in his hand or glove, it's an out. If the ball gets left on the ground, it's not an out." This play happens quite frequently during the season.

[Bob Bainter]

Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve

What argument? I'm not arguing. If a fielder traps the ball against his body with his hand or glove, and touches the base before the runner on a force, it's an out. No argument to be had.

No, that's not true. If he has it trapped up against his body with his hand, glove, or any other body part (Picture that!!!), and the runner touches the bag before he, for lack of a better word, "un-traps" it (I know, poor English), he's not out. This is rule 2.00, definition of a "tag", which is how a runner is put out:

A TAG is the action of a fielder in touching a base with his body while holding the ball securely and firmly in his hand or glove; or touching a runner with the ball, or with hishand or glove holding the ball, while holding the ball securely and firmly in his hand or glove.

So if a guy has a ball "trapped," which is what you described, against his body with his hand or glove, how can you "securely" trap it for the out?

[bobbybanaduck]

it's just like i already said.

[Bob Bainter]

Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve

No, what I meant was trapped against his body with his hand. He was bobbling the ball, then trapped it against his chest. He never stated what he trapped the ball against his chest with. I just naturally figured (not assumed) that he was bobbling the ball, then at the last second trapped it between his glove or hand and his body. Which would be an out.

Perhaps we need the complete story. It seems like we are missing information.

If I guy has a hand on the ball and the ball is pressed against his body, that's "trapped" until he shows me he really has it in his hand, or in another case, his glove. I hope that is what you mean