The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 02, 2009, 03:10pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 858
Quote:
Originally Posted by TwoBits View Post
Rule 1-3-2: The bat which may be wood or non-wood product shall be a smooth cylinder implement....

Demarini's new bat has an 8-sided flat handle with four sides being wider than the other four sides. I know the bat has already passed NFHS's inspection process since it is BESR certified, but it seems like it contradicts their own rules.

On a side note, Reebok's new Vector-O bat has holes in the handle. It is supposed to reduce drag and increase bat speed by allowing air to pass through the handle.

If you've not seen either one, a google search will find them for you.
Both of those bats were discussed during our Fed. meeting this weekend and they are illegal for high school play.

Last edited by MichaelVA2000; Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 09:54pm.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 02, 2009, 04:08pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: The Old Dominion
Posts: 82
I think Michael and I were at the same meeting. The DeMarini and Reebok bats were discussed by name, with both being characterized as illegal for FED ball in Virginia.
__________________
"...a humble and contrite heart, O God, thou wilt not despise." - Ps li

"The prompt and correct judgements of the honorable umpire elicited applause from the members of both clubs, and their thanks are tendered to him for the gentlemanly manner in which he acquitted himself of that onerous duty." - Niagara Indexensis, May 20th 1872
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 02, 2009, 06:39pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 219
I exchanged emails with Jim Paronto and Ty Halpin this morning. Both bats, the Reebok and the DeMarini are legal in the NCAA. Given the reason "rule 1-12-b-1 is intended to address the barrel of the bat (hitting area)," I would conclude the Mattingly bat is also legal.
__________________
Tony Carilli
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 03, 2009, 09:06am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 10
Per the NJSIAA, neither bat is legal in New Jersey for high school ball.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 03, 2009, 11:15am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 1,640
First local association meeting was last night. Our local rules interpreter told us that at the present time we are to consider the two bats in question as illegal for NFHS play.

He mentioned the possibility of a pending review and approval by our state rule interpreter and promised to keep us posted.

It was interesting that, after seeing this subject kicked around on multiple internet discussion boards during the past couple of months, our interpreter's Power Point presentation included a segment on these bats, complete with photos. So, they are definitely "on the radar" and being actively discussed, which might ultimately lead to a reversal of any current ban.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 23, 2009, 05:14pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 183
Quote:
Originally Posted by rookieblue View Post
I think Michael and I were at the same meeting. The DeMarini and Reebok bats were discussed by name, with both being characterized as illegal for FED ball in Virginia.
They are both legal in Utah, supposedly through FED offices.......
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 03, 2009, 04:39pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1
I heard from the National Office the Vendetta is legal for 2009
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 03, 2009, 06:19pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 1,640
Interesting that several posters have claimed that these bats have been banned by the NFHS at the national level (individual states can accept or reject any ruling as they see fit), now one says they have been approved at the national level, yet neither side has offered any specific, printed or published ruling to support their claims.

Should I say, "Show me the money", or, "Where's the beef"?

Can anyone offer anything concrete- something from their website, an issued interpretation or clarification, a news release, a memo- that directly addresses these bats?
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 16, 2009, 05:24pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 727
Wow! I had no idea a post I made a month and a half ago had generated so much discussion!
__________________
"Not all heroes have time to pose for sculptors...some still have papers to grade."
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DeMarini Bats Ed Maeder Softball 10 Fri Apr 27, 2007 02:05pm
New Demarini on ASA's Banned List IRISHMAFIA Softball 10 Mon Mar 22, 2004 04:24pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:10am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1