![]() |
|
|
|||
Quote:
This statement says a lot. So if you are not better than the guy in question, then you can't criticize him. Wow. What country is this again? Last edited by Kevin Finnerty; Tue Oct 28, 2008 at 09:06am. |
|
|||
With that logic, the observers/evaluators must be the best umpires in the world because in order to evaluate and to see flaws/areas for growth, you have to be an expert.
Quote:
__________________
It's like Deja Vu all over again |
|
|||
Quote:
For Kevin and other reading-impaired posters: I was addressing Pete's missive. I rearely read anything Kevin writes these days. I said mistakes were made. I believe criticism can be valid. I don't, however, believe that, as in Pete's post, those facts must keep us from appreciating a spectacular effort, whether by an athlete or umpire. We applaud a player who may have been the goat in one inning, when he jacks a homer in the next. Yet, according to Pete, when an umpies makes near heroic effort to get a play right...it's just his job. That's a shame. If you need any additional help in reading comprehension, let me know. |
|
|||
LOL @ "heroic effort" by a baseball umpire! Somehow equating Tim McClelland with Audie Murphy makes me laugh.
Heroic effort? "you can leave demeaning nicknames out of your posts referring to our officiating brethren. K. Thanks. Bye." Officiating.com |
|
|||
I agree. McClelland's a much better actor.
|
|
|||
Quote:
But an example of the way the "feel good" media looks at the game. The perception that okay we have replay let it fix everything is not reality. Thanks David |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|