|
|
|
Sat Oct 04, 2008, 09:38pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
Caught that too. One of the announcers said it. Practically speaking, I guess in MLB he's right. I've seen much worse done on slides and it hasn't been called. The runner in this case could have slid to the right within reach of the base and taken Counsel's feet out and it would not have been int. He went in standing up crouched as he passed the base. I don't even know if I would have had int. in high school.
|
|
Sat Oct 04, 2008, 10:29pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
I was wondering that one myself?? I must have missed that update. In all honesty, I'm not sure how they got interference on the play at all. Obvously, it was the FPSR.
|
|
Sat Oct 04, 2008, 10:47pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
This is definitely interference, per 6.05(m). MLBUM 6.3 indicates that any intentional contact with a fielder attempting a double play that is not a legitimate attempt to advance and stay on a base is interference. Given that Victorino overran second like he was running to first, it is quite obvious that it was not an attempt to stay on the base.
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Fpsr | thumpferee | Baseball | 9 | Tue Apr 29, 2008 12:56pm |
| Fpsr | fmsc | Baseball | 9 | Tue Oct 17, 2006 09:03am |
| FPSR | BigUmp56 | Baseball | 2 | Tue Nov 22, 2005 09:47am |
| FPSR? | thumpferee | Baseball | 3 | Mon Apr 18, 2005 05:46pm |
| FPSR violation? | Kaliix | Baseball | 3 | Mon Apr 11, 2005 12:33pm |
Hybrid Mode
