![]() |
|
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
If you're so insecure in your abilities as an umpire that you have to peak at R1 or R2, you have more serious issues. JMHO Last edited by etn_ump; Tue Jun 24, 2008 at 04:36pm. |
|
|||
Quote:
![]() JEAPU - PBUC sez peek, ya peek (at R2). I paid $4000 for that tidbit, I'm gonna get my money's worth. I never understood why guys couldn't just step and turn toward first to see the throw, or the need to show your profile to home plate. I don't agree to disagree. You're wrong. You can disagree if you want, but you're still wrong. That's what people say without admitting they're wrong. As Rut says, "Peace" |
|
|||
Helluva tidbit for $4000.
I ain't wrong. Been doing this for 30 years, Summer World Series finals, HS State tournaments, some D2 as I've gotten older, etc. Just because you paid some guys that work one base to tell you how to umpire don't necessarily mean they're right. Have great games. |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
When in doubt, bang 'em out! Ozzy |
|
|||
Pay attention Ozzy, I already did. Here, I'll copy and paste it for you.
Quote:
Pay attention. |
|
|||
Much ado...
Yeeeshhh....This has taken up multiple pages? There might be a recommended method, but like many issues in officiating, whatever works for you. If one prefers to take a quick glance at R2, so? Hopefully theyve arrived at that choice through trial and error, and find that works best for them. Or not. Doesnt make someone better than someone else, just as the ridiculous argument of using an indicator or not, makes someone better.
Slight tip that I use with R2. And it helps, me anyways. With R2, I will turn to take a look. But, instead of trying to get R2 in my sight, I turn my head slightly to the right, and pick up the area R2 would be running into, if he were going. If R2 "comes into frame", I start towards my spot for the steal of 3rd. I get that extra step, and am always set, waiting for the play. Huge difference. If he doesnt, I stay put. If he is going "late", I move when I recognize the steal. Usually on this, R2 is toast. Ive done it enough where I got the timing down. Hey, theres that "timing" thingy... Just my observation..works for me....your mileage may vary. |
|
|||
Quote:
Then I'm wondering what this was supposed to mean. Quote:
Tim. |
|
|||
Quote:
Well lets see, last time I checked Jim Evans worked more than one base, and it would be my guess just a game or two more than you. Oh and lets not forget a couple World Series, an ALCS or two. Oh yearh and them there All Star games, yeah I paid the guy, damn proud of it also. He says your wrong, PBUC says your wrong, but thats OK.. IMHO |
|
|||
Quote:
BTW, NOT taking a peek at R2 will get you dinged on your NCAA eval. |
|
||||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Sorry to derail this a bit... but OJD said I was wrong for not moving with the runner...
I was told as I was become certified by our clinician to not move from C until you knew the pitch would not be put in play, and never told otherwise since. Do I need to be moving with that runner? How much with him (keeping in mind I may still have a call at first to make in two man)? I do know to get to the 45 foot line and turn with the throw. Help? |
|
|||
Quote:
Saw a varsity umpire set up between F6 and F5. PU w/ years of experience didn't tell him anything. Of course the guy probably meant well, but if he isn't standing in a proper C alignment, he might as well set up right behind the pitcher. Seems to me, the catcher's throw takes you to F5's glove and F5's glove takes you to the tag. Bang 'em if he's out {just sell it}.
__________________
SAump ![]() Last edited by SAump; Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 12:26pm. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ump position? | Shef24 | Baseball | 12 | Mon Jun 04, 2007 03:13pm |
Windup position - position of pivot foot | BigGuy | Baseball | 3 | Thu May 31, 2007 02:21am |
Set position | ofishe8r | Baseball | 7 | Sun Apr 11, 2004 10:03am |
Set Position | dcasimir | Baseball | 1 | Mon May 06, 2002 01:07am |
FT position | rcwilco | Basketball | 8 | Fri Mar 01, 2002 11:37am |