![]() |
|
|
|
|||
|
I found this in the JEA, Walt. The key seems to be that the umpire needs to be deceived that the runner is making a legitimate attempt to advance. I was kind of concerned that I did the wrong thing.
A casebook note was added in 1976. It clarified the issue of a pitcher making a complete turn (without hesitating toward first base) and throwing to second when the umpire believed the runner was attempting to advance...see 8.05 End Notes (b). tim. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
From the MLBUM The key to understanding the above two plays is for the umpire to use good judgment in deciding whether or not the runner was making an actual attempt to advance to third base or whether he was bluffing. These plays will most likely happen with a 3-2 count and two out. Tim. |
|
|||
|
If the defense can't tag the runner out at 2B or get him in a run-down, then he wasn't going.
The issue isn't whether the fake was good enough to fool the umpire, it's whether he was actually going. If you don't balk this, the defense gets a big advantage (for players who shave).
__________________
Cheers, mb |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Balk question | JR12 | Baseball | 5 | Thu May 24, 2007 11:16am |
| Balk question? | Hobe | Baseball | 7 | Wed Jun 21, 2006 11:30pm |
| Yet another balk question | harmbu | Baseball | 4 | Tue Aug 30, 2005 10:54am |
| To Balk Or Not To Balk, That Is The Question.. | chuckfan1 | Baseball | 21 | Wed Sep 03, 2003 03:21pm |
| Balk question???? | IsUcKaTbAsEbaLL | Baseball | 5 | Wed Aug 14, 2002 09:45pm |