The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 1.00 average. Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 08, 2008, 09:53pm
In Time Out
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: In a hut
Posts: 911
Send a message via AIM to fitump56 Send a message via MSN to fitump56 Send a message via Yahoo to fitump56 Send a message via Skype™ to fitump56
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dakota
PMFBI... As a fan of MLB, I disagree strongly that replay should be used. I also do not like the use of the QuesTec for controlling the strike zone.

One of the reasons (IMO) baseball is such a good game is due to the officiating by completely human umpires, including their skills and their approaches to the game.

If using technology to call the "perfect" game was such a good thing, why did Curt Schilling take a bat to one of the QuesTec cameras recently?
If Curt Schilling is your Poster Boi for "why no technology in baseball officiating" God Help The Old Guard.
__________________
"Never try to teach a pig to eat reasonably. It wastes your time and the pig will argue that he is fat because of genetics. While drinking a 2.675 six packs a day."
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 09, 2008, 10:46am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
Quote:
Originally Posted by fitump56
If Curt Schilling is your Poster Boi for "why no technology in baseball officiating" God Help The Old Guard.
I clearly identified my perspective on this as a fan, not a member of the guard, old or new. My point with Schilling was simple, but apparently not simple enough for you to comprehend. Umpires don't like the "technology" solution. Neither do pitchers. Why? It removes the human element (or in the case of QuesTec, just distorts it, since the technology still requires a different human to calibrate it, and the umpires and players recognize that each ball park calibrates it differently).

And, neither does this fan like the technology-supplied solution.

Getting the technically correct call 100% of the time by using technology is not a good thing, IMO. I disagree at this fundamental level. 100% correct calls enforced by automatons is not the holy grail of the ideal baseball game.

Anyone who thinks the "technology" will end with QuesTec and video replay fails to recognize the real trend. Eventually, the technology will be there to use electronic sensors to make sure many more parts of the game are done 100% "correctly." Will this make baseball a better game? Absolutely NOT!
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu Apr 10, 2008, 07:21am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dakota
That's rich. Pot, meet kettle.

Machine-generated accuracy (whatever percentage) has not improved baseball and increasing the percentage further with machines will not improve baseball. The "uniform" strike zone is also a myth, whether in QuesTec parks or not.

You can argue all you want about what MLB wants. With that farce of a pretend commissioner, what MLB wants has not been in the best interests of baseball for some time now.
Excellent post, start to finish.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu Apr 10, 2008, 01:41pm
rei
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Interesting that people are against athletes using technology (is steroids not a form of technology?) to improve their part of the game, but all for replay to improve the umpires part of the game?

I say, if you rule out steroids, you HAVE to rule out replay.

I am sticking with that.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:53pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1