The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 5 votes, 1.00 average. Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 28, 2008, 11:51am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 101
Infield fly rule

Had a couple of plays yesterday with 1st and 2nd , 1 out, B1 hits pop up over 1st base with F3 running out making the catch with his back to infield. Same situation later in game with F9 coming in calling F3 off, to make the catch.
How would you rule this?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 28, 2008, 11:56am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
In both instances the crucial judgment call is whether the fly ball "can be fielded by an infielder with ordinary effort." This us usually HTBT.

If the infielder has to turn around to run out for the catch, and makes it running away, then I'm generally not calling an infield fly. That's more than "ordinary effort."

The second case is probably an infield fly: I'm envisioning a high pop fly, with F3 backing up and F9 calling him off. Still, many of these will be HTBT.

Edited to add: if the second situation is the same as the first, then it's still not an infield fly, no matter who catches the ball. I was thinking of a different case.
__________________
Cheers,
mb

Last edited by mbyron; Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 11:59am.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 01, 2008, 12:39am
In Time Out
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: In a hut
Posts: 911
Send a message via AIM to fitump56 Send a message via MSN to fitump56 Send a message via Yahoo to fitump56 Send a message via Skype™ to fitump56
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron
In both instances the crucial judgment call is whether the fly ball "can be fielded by an infielder with ordinary effort."
Bzzzzzzzzt, wrong, INF do NOT have to be involved in an IFF. In Big Boy Ball, an OF can easily be determined inside the ordinary effort call to be the player who is putting out the ordinary effort hence = IFF.
__________________
"Never try to teach a pig to eat reasonably. It wastes your time and the pig will argue that he is fat because of genetics. While drinking a 2.675 six packs a day."
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 01, 2008, 06:26am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 1,428
Quote:
Originally Posted by fitump56
Bzzzzzzzzt, wrong, INF do NOT have to be involved in an IFF. In Big Boy Ball, an OF can easily be determined inside the ordinary effort call to be the player who is putting out the ordinary effort hence = IFF.
Bzzzzzt. That's not what mbyron said.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 01, 2008, 08:53am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,606
Ding ding ding! You are correct, dash. fitump56 is wrong in his interpretation of what mbyron said. An Infield Fly IS judged solely on ordinary effort by an INfielder, but this does not preclude an outfielder from gloving a ball that can still be called Infield Fly.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 01, 2008, 04:55pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 1,428
Quote:
Originally Posted by UMP25
Ding ding ding! You are correct, dash. fitump56 is wrong in his interpretation of what mbyron said. An Infield Fly IS judged solely on ordinary effort by an INfielder, but this does not preclude an outfielder from gloving a ball that can still be called Infield Fly.
You didn't just say gloving did you?
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 01, 2008, 04:40pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Virgin Gorda
Posts: 228
Originally Posted by mbyron
In both instances the crucial judgment call is whether the fly ball "can be fielded by an infielder with ordinary effort."

Quote:
Originally Posted by fitump56
Bzzzzzzzzt, wrong, INF do NOT have to be involved in an IFF. In Big Boy Ball, an OF can easily be determined inside the ordinary effort call to be the player who is putting out the ordinary effort hence = IFF.
A key to this interpretation is the ability for the fly ball to have considerable hang time. As you ponted out, this will often not be the case in the younger age groups even at 60/90 ball.

mbyron is incorrect in assuming that only an INF can be judged as attaining OE in the interpretation of the IFF rule. F7-9 if positioned in the infield, they are still charted as OF (feel free to see the Definition Of IFF), are INFs for the purpose of this call.
__________________
"The size of the mind is proportionate to the ability to challenge the norm. "

Last edited by Interested Ump; Tue Apr 01, 2008 at 05:01pm.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 28, 2008, 12:01pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 336
Quote:
Originally Posted by rngrck
Had a couple of plays yesterday with 1st and 2nd , 1 out, B1 hits pop up over 1st base with F3 running out making the catch with his back to infield. Same situation later in game with F9 coming in calling F3 off, to make the catch.
How would you rule this?
mbyron is correct. How did you rule on these plays?
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 28, 2008, 12:40pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 101
I ruled no infield fly for the reasons Bryon commented as no ordinary catch. The second situation involved F3 running out in short right field while being called off. Judgement was the key factor here and explained it to the defensive coach. Thanks guys for your input.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Sat Mar 29, 2008, 09:17pm
In Time Out
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: In a hut
Posts: 911
Send a message via AIM to fitump56 Send a message via MSN to fitump56 Send a message via Yahoo to fitump56 Send a message via Skype™ to fitump56
Quote:
Originally Posted by rngrck
Had a couple of plays yesterday with 1st and 2nd , 1 out, B1 hits pop up over 1st base with F3 running out making the catch with his back to infield. Same situation later in game with F9 coming in calling F3 off, to make the catch.
How would you rule this?
The key words in OBR is "ordinary effort". I would think that there are few times when an INFer has his back to INF that "ordinary effort" prevails.

F9 is a completely different sitch. OF can be held to the IFR if the IF is high enough, the OF has enough chance and the INF has been waived off or failed to properly playhis position.
__________________
"Never try to teach a pig to eat reasonably. It wastes your time and the pig will argue that he is fat because of genetics. While drinking a 2.675 six packs a day."
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Sat Mar 29, 2008, 10:54pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Virgin Gorda
Posts: 228
Quote:
Originally Posted by fitump56
The key words in OBR is "ordinary effort". I would think that there are few times when an INFer has his back to INF that "ordinary effort" prevails.

F9 is a completely different sitch. OF can be held to the IFR if the IF is high enough, the OF has enough chance and the INF has been waived off or failed to properly playhis position.
Deej, imagine that there exists a world where you are correct?

"Cats and dogs sleeping together..."

One of few OBR's that have endured the times is this concept of ordinary effort. Way back when, players would routinely allow infield flies to drop to ground. Rs who were unable to logically advance in this fly ball situation, were forced out at the base ahead.

Masterminds as they were, comin fresh off beating the Redcoats, the Infield Fly Rule prohibited defensive players from thisw subterfuge.

With this history, and logical thought, in the umpire's logical head, ordinary effort becomes the milestone for Infield Fly Rule decision making.
__________________
"The size of the mind is proportionate to the ability to challenge the norm. "
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Sat Mar 29, 2008, 10:59pm
In Time Out
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: In a hut
Posts: 911
Send a message via AIM to fitump56 Send a message via MSN to fitump56 Send a message via Yahoo to fitump56 Send a message via Skype™ to fitump56
Quote:
Originally Posted by Interested Ump
Deej, imagine that there exists a world where you are correct?

"Cats and dogs sleeping together..."
Would thia be the same world where you don't have your multi and I have to escort your a$$ and CFI your logs?
__________________
"Never try to teach a pig to eat reasonably. It wastes your time and the pig will argue that he is fat because of genetics. While drinking a 2.675 six packs a day."
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Sat Mar 29, 2008, 11:09pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Virgin Gorda
Posts: 228
Quote:
Originally Posted by fitump56
Would thia be the same world where you don't have your multi and I have to escort your a$$ and CFI your logs?
Yes, that would be the same one, Frick. Excuse me while I, Frack, calendar your women who pay no attention to you, they see strait through you, come to my side for comfort.
Go to bed, long days ahead.
__________________
"The size of the mind is proportionate to the ability to challenge the norm. "

Last edited by Interested Ump; Sat Mar 29, 2008 at 11:12pm.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 01, 2008, 12:34am
In Time Out
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: In a hut
Posts: 911
Send a message via AIM to fitump56 Send a message via MSN to fitump56 Send a message via Yahoo to fitump56 Send a message via Skype™ to fitump56
Quote:
Originally Posted by Interested Ump
Yes, that would be the same one, Frick. Excuse me while I, Frack, calendar your women who pay no attention to you, they see strait through you, come to my side for comfort.
Go to bed, long days ahead.
Roger wilco and flyboy talk back at ya'.
__________________
"Never try to teach a pig to eat reasonably. It wastes your time and the pig will argue that he is fat because of genetics. While drinking a 2.675 six packs a day."
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 31, 2008, 10:53pm
In Time Out
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: In a hut
Posts: 911
Send a message via AIM to fitump56 Send a message via MSN to fitump56 Send a message via Yahoo to fitump56 Send a message via Skype™ to fitump56
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrUmpire
Oh, boy. I love flyboy talk. Don't forget to mention PIC hours.
1100 and you? Velocity XL and you?
__________________
"Never try to teach a pig to eat reasonably. It wastes your time and the pig will argue that he is fat because of genetics. While drinking a 2.675 six packs a day."
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Infield Fly Rule mccann Softball 1 Sat Apr 01, 2006 06:31pm
Infield Fly Rule lilump03 Baseball 6 Mon Jun 17, 2002 08:05am
Infield Fly Rule Just Curious Softball 3 Thu May 09, 2002 11:47am
Infield fly rule ac Baseball 6 Mon Apr 22, 2002 10:50am
Infield-Fly Rule Just Curious Softball 5 Sat Apr 07, 2001 02:57pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:08pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1