|
Sat Mar 15, 2008, 11:48pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
Great posts regarding the Fed OBS rule. I understand why Fed has the new rule but don't like the way it is supposed to be inforced in some instances. I have had a few this year that I don't like to award but have to due to the new rule. Ex; R1 gets back safely to 1B on a pick move by F1 but F3 has his size 15 foot across the leading edge of the bag prior to possession of the ball. In the years past, no problem, he was safe. Under new rule, R1 is supposed to be awarded 2nd. Is this what Fed wanted to achieve with this rule?
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Obstruction? | Antonella | Softball | 25 | Wed Jun 06, 2007 10:58am |
| Obstruction or not? | IamMatt | Softball | 8 | Mon Apr 16, 2007 05:03pm |
| Fed obstruction VS ASA "new" obstruction | DaveASA/FED | Softball | 6 | Thu Apr 29, 2004 03:27pm |
| obstruction | scyguy | Baseball | 7 | Wed Apr 21, 2004 09:11pm |
| NSA / Obstruction | Bandit | Softball | 4 | Mon Apr 19, 2004 02:26pm |
Threaded Mode
