Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Klokard
Great posts regarding the Fed OBS rule. I understand why Fed has the new rule but don't like the way it is supposed to be inforced in some instances. I have had a few this year that I don't like to award but have to due to the new rule. Ex; R1 gets back safely to 1B on a pick move by F1 but F3 has his size 15 foot across the leading edge of the bag prior to possession of the ball. In the years past, no problem, he was safe. Under new rule, R1 is supposed to be awarded 2nd. Is this what Fed wanted to achieve with this rule?
|
Yep. It doesn't matter if the runner worked his way around the obstruction, penalize the illegal act.
This no different than F4 blocking access to second on a steal and R1 working his way to the base before getting tagged.
Or, a criminal breaks into a house and discovers nothing worth stealing and leaves. He's still arrested for the initial act.
The "no harm, no foul" theory doesn't appy.