![]() |
|
|||
|
Situation very similar to OP, described in Jaksa/Roder:
"R3 and R1, two outs. The batter singles. R1 misses second and is thrown out at third for the third out. The defense's appeal is upheld at second: this is an advantageous fourth out and supersedes the out at third- R3 does not score". (Jaksa/Roder, page 86, example 2). |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 123 + 86 = retired | JugglingReferee | Football | 4 | Fri Aug 04, 2006 03:41pm |
| Simple Question on Appealed Play | KathyCG | Softball | 4 | Fri Jul 14, 2006 11:54am |
| retired runner | CecilOne | Softball | 16 | Tue Apr 25, 2006 09:23am |
| Retired runner called out??? | blueump | Baseball | 6 | Wed Apr 28, 2004 04:48pm |
| interference by retired runner | shipwreck | Softball | 15 | Thu Sep 18, 2003 07:00am |