The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 01, 2007, 11:31pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 747
Did he Touch the plate?

The Rockies win on a sacrifice fly in extra innings but did the runner touch the plate?

Tim McClelland said he did.

TV said he didn't.

What an embarassment to MLB umpiring.
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 01, 2007, 11:34pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,458
Tim was working with a seven second delay. And yes, he did miss this call. Perhaps he can retire with Hoffman.
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 01, 2007, 11:38pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,219
Send a message via AIM to TussAgee11
Never saw a replay that tells me that he didn't touch the plate. An overhead shot is the only way to really tell. On the angle from LF looking down the baseline, the runner's hand gets shielded by the catcher's shoe. Then from the angle behind the plate, the hand gets shielded by the runner's sliding body.

Tim did get caught out of position, he moved to 3BLX, which looked like would provide him with the swipe tag angle. Then it was a banger at the front of the plate.

So "Tim like" to wait like that too... no hesitation, just good timing, and nonchalant Tim McClelland safe call.
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 01, 2007, 11:40pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,226
JimPorter, can we get a video clip?
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 02, 2007, 03:45am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 711
Send a message via ICQ to Jim Porter Send a message via Yahoo to Jim Porter
Quote:
Originally Posted by bossman72
JimPorter, can we get a video clip?
Here ya go:

http://menotomyjournal.com/mlbvids/col.wmv
__________________
Jim Porter
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 02, 2007, 05:21am
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Still hard to tell. It looked like McClelland had a good view from 3BLX (insert rolling eyes here).

Whatever. The Padres can't blame this loss on the umpire. Hoffman gave the game away and the team choked on the same piece of meat the Mets did. Paging Dr. Heimlich for a little maneuver to be performed on my pathetic Padres (insert angry face here).
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 02, 2007, 07:57am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,188
Quote:
Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve
Still hard to tell. It looked like McClelland had a good view from 3BLX (insert rolling eyes here).

Whatever. The Padres can't blame this loss on the umpire. Hoffman gave the game away and the team choked on the same piece of meat the Mets did. Paging Dr. Heimlich for a little maneuver to be performed on my pathetic Padres (insert angry face here).
I think 3BLX is the proper place for this call. If the umpire was 1BLX the runner's back would have blocked the umpire from seeing the runner's hand touch (or miss) the plate.

I agree with others that the umpire could have sold the call more.
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 02, 2007, 05:30am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 2,439
Is it possible that Holiday's hand could have gotten under the cleats of F2? It almost looks like that is what happened! Also, at the end of the video, Holiday is rolling over and it looks like he is going to grab his hand but the video cuts off.

Just a thought - I don't really care about the NL!
__________________
When in doubt, bang 'em out!
Ozzy
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 02, 2007, 06:12am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Here's what I see. From the angle behind home plate, you can see F2 block the runner's hand off the plate. But R3's hand pushes the foot back along 3BLX. If R3 touched the plate, that's how he did it.

I do not see a touch, but the hand pushes the blocking foot back enough to expose the plate to make a touch possible.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 02, 2007, 07:11am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Newburgh NY
Posts: 1,822
[QUOTE]
Quote:
Originally Posted by ozzy6900
Is it possible that Holiday's hand could have gotten under the cleats of F2? It almost looks like that is what happened!
Ozzy, if that's what happened then McClelland would have signalled safe immediately. There would have been no need for him to wait. From the video, McClelland, didn't see a tag of the plate that's why the no signal. Then he gave the safe sign. It appears as though McClelland simply Froze on the call.

I am really surprised the Padres didn't go more ballistic on the play.

Bottom line last night's play is why MLB NEEDS Instant replay. Give Football credit regardless of what one thinks of IR.

Pete Booth
__________________
Peter M. Booth
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 02, 2007, 09:30am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 915
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Porter
View from third to home it appears he doesn't have the plate. View third base line extended not conclusive either way in my opinion. Plate ump had a good look and the runner (judging from body language) obviously thought he got it. Barrett holds the ball he's out. Typical Barrett screw up. Gotta go with the call.
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 02, 2007, 11:39am
We don't rent pigs
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,627
Quote:
Originally Posted by gordon30307
...... and the runner (judging from body language) obviously thought he got it.

I thought the runner's body language said he did not even know where he was for a minute or two. In the interview later when asked if he got the plate, he said something like, "Oh, I don't know. I got hit pretty hard."
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum.
It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow.


Lonesome Dove
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 02, 2007, 11:06am
In Time Out
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: In a hut
Posts: 911
Send a message via AIM to fitump56 Send a message via MSN to fitump56 Send a message via Yahoo to fitump56 Send a message via Skype™ to fitump56
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Porter
Nice positioning.

NOT.

Lemme see, I got R barreling down the 3B dugout side of the baseline grass, and F2 with his foot past the top of the plate. So, naturally,I swaddle over from seeing both as I head toward RF, getting perfectlly blocked by F2 and his foot.

Knowing I have screwed the pooch, I take the only "out" I have left which is the "oh he's so safe I can make this casual palms down sign whilst closing in a yard or so just in case I am out of camera range."

Good thing Barrett didn't jump up like he knew what was going on. Timmy fooled 'em all.
__________________
"Never try to teach a pig to eat reasonably. It wastes your time and the pig will argue that he is fat because of genetics. While drinking a 2.675 six packs a day."
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 02, 2007, 02:48pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 915
Quote:
Originally Posted by fitump56
Nice positioning.

NOT.

Lemme see, I got R barreling down the 3B dugout side of the baseline grass, and F2 with his foot past the top of the plate. So, naturally,I swaddle over from seeing both as I head toward RF, getting perfectlly blocked by F2 and his foot.

Knowing I have screwed the pooch, I take the only "out" I have left which is the "oh he's so safe I can make this casual palms down sign whilst closing in a yard or so just in case I am out of camera range."

Good thing Barrett didn't jump up like he knew what was going on. Timmy fooled 'em all.
Look at the play again. The PU is TBLX and not right field. He had a great look at the play. Actually he had a better look than the camera angles. Timing was great (could have sold it better) if Barret holds the ball he's out. If not he's safe.

Actually the "safe play" is to call him out. Easy to argue he never got the plate.
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 01, 2007, 11:43pm
Stop staring at me swan.
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,974
Timing was good...after all, he couldn't see the ball...and if he couldn't see the ball in this instance, surely he couldn't see Holliday touch the plate. I think he missed it too...but there isn't any evidence to say for 100% that he missed the plate...and if you're not 100% sure, then the runner is safe. My question to Tim would be...if Barrett came up w/ the ball, would he have called him out? Based upon the timing of when he made the safe call, I would lean toward him calling Holliday out...but, we'll never know.
__________________
It's like Deja Vu all over again
Closed Thread

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
First to touch RefTip Basketball 12 Tue Feb 28, 2006 12:26am
Can BR who hits a HR return to touch Home Plate strike4 Softball 15 Sun Mar 27, 2005 09:39am
Coed slopitch and the plate line vs home plate SactoBlue Softball 14 Thu Oct 28, 2004 11:42am
Can't be the first one to touch it? dub3 Basketball 18 Wed Apr 21, 2004 10:14am
Runner does not touch plate, enters dugout Bluefoot Softball 15 Fri Aug 29, 2003 03:44pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:16am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1