|
Thu Aug 30, 2007, 01:56pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
I agree that if you can remotely make a case that there was a play, you call the interference. Any doubt whatsoever goes to the offended team. "Would have been safe" does not automatically mean there was no play.
On a related line in this thread, if there is no such thing as a great call, then there is no such thing as a bad call. All calls are simply either correct or incorrect.
__________________
greymule More whiskey—and fresh horses for my men! Roll Tide! 
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Tell me somebody saw the Mets game tonight... | TussAgee11 | Baseball | 5 | Tue Jun 20, 2006 06:56pm |
| Mets-Stros game | mattmets | Baseball | 14 | Wed Jun 08, 2005 07:42pm |
| sac or hit on game ending play? | medinger2 | Baseball | 3 | Tue May 03, 2005 01:19pm |
| Game ending interference | blueump | Baseball | 1 | Wed May 26, 2004 07:55am |
Threaded Mode
