The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri Aug 24, 2007, 10:10am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Newport News Virginia
Posts: 77
Bunt question

Hello,

I was watching a summer high school baseball league here in Virginia in which I saw a strange thing happen. Situation #1 The batter squares too bunt on the squeeze play and misses the ball but he steps on the plate and the umpire calls deadball and sends the runner back too third. This is where it gets hairy the coach comes out and argues that he can step on the plate as long as he does not make contact with the ball at the same time. This is totally legal the coach states, the umpire stuck with his call and the coach heads back too the dugout. I was sitting behind his dugout and he was actually telling his players to step on the plate too confuse the catcher on the squeeze play. I did umpire back in the day and I do know that if you make contact with the plate while hitting the ball you are out and its a deadball.

What if you have a team that steps on the plate on purpose without making contact on these squeeze bunt plays. What is the ruling on this?

Any information would be greatly appreciated.
__________________
Watch your thoughts; they become words. Watch your words; they become actions. Watch your actions, they become habits. Watch your habits, they become character. Watch your character; it becomes your destiny.


Tim Harris
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Aug 24, 2007, 10:25am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 362
In OBR, only if the batter's entire foot is out of the batter's box when they contact the ball is the batter out. Simply because the batter's foot is touching home plate doesn't mean that he is out of the batter's box.

Not only must he be out of the batter's box but he MUST contact the ball, in this situation there was no contact so no foul.

Sorry to say the umpire was wrong.

Having said that, on this situation if the runner is attempting to come home and the batter squares in front of the catcher for the sole purpose of blocking the catcher from getting to the runner you might have batter interference.

Last edited by tibear; Fri Aug 24, 2007 at 10:29am.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri Aug 24, 2007, 10:29am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
I know of no rule that would allow the PU to send R3 back to third. He could have called the batter out for batter interference if there were 2 outs (7-3-5).

And you're correct that if the batter steps on the plate and contacts the ball (fair or foul) he's out - though most of us do not see where the batter's feet are when he contacts the ball.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Aug 24, 2007, 01:35pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 362
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron
I know of no rule that would allow the PU to send R3 back to third. He could have called the batter out for batter interference if there were 2 outs (7-3-5).

And you're correct that if the batter steps on the plate and contacts the ball (fair or foul) he's out - though most of us do not see where the batter's feet are when he contacts the ball.
You must be quoting FED because in OBR simply touching home plate and contacting the ball isn't enough. The umpire must be sure the batter has a foot completely out of the batter's box before being called out.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Fri Aug 24, 2007, 02:47pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Greater Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 611
Send a message via Yahoo to umpduck11
Quote:
Originally Posted by tibear
You must be quoting FED because in OBR simply touching home plate and contacting the ball isn't enough. The umpire must be sure the batter has a foot completely out of the batter's box before being called out.
The OP said it was a High School summer game; I assumed that meant it was played under Fed rules.
__________________
All generalizations are bad. - R.H. Grenier
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Fri Aug 24, 2007, 09:05pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: massachusetts
Posts: 465
Send a message via AIM to bobbybanaduck
you know the old saying about assuming. here in mass we don't use fed rules in hs.

toooooooo many o's.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Sat Aug 25, 2007, 03:43am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Greater Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 611
Send a message via Yahoo to umpduck11
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbybanaduck
you know the old saying about assuming. here in mass we don't use fed rules in hs.

toooooooo many o's.
Good point.
__________________
All generalizations are bad. - R.H. Grenier
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bunt flemmer Baseball 74 Mon Aug 06, 2007 05:41pm
Another Bunt Question BktBallRef Baseball 8 Wed May 31, 2006 06:18pm
when is a sac, bunt a hit dougkrieger Baseball 2 Tue May 03, 2005 05:49pm
Bunt attempt question DownTownTonyBrown Baseball 5 Mon Jul 21, 2003 05:45pm
Bunt question buckweat Baseball 21 Wed Apr 03, 2002 07:49pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:55pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1