The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jul 13, 2007, 11:08am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Newburgh NY
Posts: 1,822
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim C
Matt:

Just wondered if you noticed anything more about the BU at your game?

My MiLB contact has said that there are two additional requirements for BUs that are being tested:

1) As a pitch is delivered the BU (when working inside the diamond) is required to be moving towards the next "potential" play . . . by the time F2 returns the ball to F1 the BU is required to be back to his initial position and,

2) All "first calls" (with the exception of the double play pivot activity) are to be made by the BU at the edge of the cutout of the base. Any second call made in the infield is to be made from the working area behind the mound.

I just wondered if you noticed these activities?



Regards,
Tee would like your opinion.

I am all for trying new things but what the mechanics do not address is the difference between wood vs. metal

I do not know about you but I almost "bought the farm" a couple of times off of shots from a metal bat. I almost got hit the other night in fact.

As a result I find myself setting up in a "deeper B and C positions" to give me a little more reaction time should an 18/19 yr. old get a hold of one.

What I have seen "suffered" somewhat is the pick-off plays at first. If you are in a "deep B" it's difficult to get a REAL good angle on the pick-off at first and as a result the runner(s) for BOTH teams gain a slight advantage.

In a nutshell what's your take on umpire mechanics when Metal is used as opposed to the traditional wood

Thanks

Pete Booth
__________________
Peter M. Booth
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jul 13, 2007, 11:48am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 91
I went to a SAL league game back in May and I didn't see anything from a mechanics standpoint that appeared out of the ordinary. Sounds like this may be for recent PBUC grads (Garth probably will cover it in his articles).

Just wondering if they will re-write the red book if these mechanics are approved across the board?

Lawrence
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jul 14, 2007, 12:14am
In Time Out
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: In a hut
Posts: 911
Send a message via AIM to fitump56 Send a message via MSN to fitump56 Send a message via Yahoo to fitump56 Send a message via Skype™ to fitump56
Quote:
Originally Posted by GarthB
I really enjoyed spending time with these young men and found it especially fun, and refreshing, to meet an intelligent and experienced Canadian umpire.
Refreshing?
__________________
"Never try to teach a pig to eat reasonably. It wastes your time and the pig will argue that he is fat because of genetics. While drinking a 2.675 six packs a day."
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PBUC , J/R, and Evans SanDiegoSteve Baseball 207 Sat Dec 03, 2005 08:55am
PBUC Manual Prince Baseball 1 Sat May 31, 2003 11:11am
Balk - new PBUC ruling..... Rog Baseball 7 Wed May 15, 2002 11:20am
PBUC 3.14 greymule Baseball 37 Thu Apr 11, 2002 09:24am
PBUC and an overthrow/obstruction devilsadvocate Baseball 6 Tue Dec 04, 2001 04:58pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:50pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1