The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 20, 2007, 04:18pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 605
Quote:
Originally Posted by umpduck11
Have ya'll been encouraged to use the "time out" restriction more because of the fine scale ? Because here in the 'Ham, we have. Not that I think it will make any difference.
In SC...ABSOLUTELY. In fact, the league will overturn the ejection (strike it from the books) if the Head Coach was not restricted first. The only time a head coach can be ejected without being restricted is if he engages in truly severe conduct (i.e. charging, personal attack on umpire's integrity (usually with curse words), etc.)

For example, if a coach continues to argue (not personally attacking you...but just not letting the game get going again, and not letting "it" go) you must (1) warn (2) restrict (3) then eject.

Let me say this: if you eject without doing steps 1 & 2, you better be absolutely sure the conduct is severe. The league tends, IMO, to overturn ejections before upholding them if no restriction was given.

For example, I had a game where the head coach argued balls and strikes. I gave a verbal warning. On the next pitch, he jumped up and yelled "that's awful" and at the same time threw is hat on the ground. I ejected him. (Classic pro ejection: "if the hat comes off...the coach must go!") The league overturned it for failing to issue a restriction.

Assistant coaches are not subject to this analysis. We have permission to immediately eject them without warning/restriction. Same with players.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 20, 2007, 04:50pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 505
Quote:
Originally Posted by lawump
In fact, the league will overturn the ejection (strike it from the books) if the Head Coach was not restricted first.

For example, if a coach continues to argue (not personally attacking you...but just not letting the game get going again, and not letting "it" go) you must (1) warn (2) restrict (3) then eject.

Let me say this: if you eject without doing steps 1 & 2, you better be absolutely sure the conduct is severe. The league tends, IMO, to overturn ejections before upholding them if no restriction was given.
I'm glad I don't have to work games there. This stinks of the inmates running the asylum! I feel for my SC brothers.
__________________
"They can holler at the uniform all they want, but when they start hollering at the man wearing the uniform they're going to be in trouble."- Joe Brinkman
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Alabama ejections will result in fines voiceoflg Football 5 Sun Aug 06, 2006 07:37pm
NFL refs and fines for bad calls devonclose Football 11 Thu Apr 06, 2006 01:45pm
My First Fan Ejection Luv4Asian8 Basketball 10 Mon Jan 16, 2006 06:39pm
first ejection in a while moose69 Softball 46 Sat Jul 05, 2003 09:17pm
ejection? John Schaefferkoetter Basketball 3 Thu Jan 09, 2003 11:02am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:25am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1