![]() |
|
|||
Quote:
First, I suggest you look up the definition of interference. Interference, by definition, affects the play. It may not always affect the result of the play, but it affects the play. Second, if you'd read your own post a few times, perhaps you could see that you are proving the point of others, not your own. One of the reasons we can correctly enforce type B is that we do allow the play to continue "many seconds" to see if the obstruction did indeed affect the play. We do not have to wait to see that with most interference. It affects the play immediately. (You might also want to find out what "play" means) Again, because most interference affects the play IMMEDIATELY, we kill it and enforce the penalty. Because type B, again by defintion, (maybe you should also review obstruction) does not affect the play immediately, we do not. I think it was Dave Hensley who once told me that when it's you against the world, 99% of the time, bet on the world. The rule is a good one. It serves it's intended purpose well. 99% of baseball understands it.
__________________
GB |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Runner interference versus umpire interference | Jay R | Baseball | 1 | Thu Apr 28, 2005 07:00pm |
interference??? | slowballbaker | Softball | 13 | Fri Apr 15, 2005 09:37pm |
Interference | WinterWillie | Softball | 6 | Tue Aug 03, 2004 12:13pm |
Interference | WinterWillie | Softball | 3 | Sat Jul 17, 2004 12:27pm |
Interference | Larry | Softball | 5 | Thu Jun 06, 2002 09:31am |