![]() |
|
|
|||
OK, thanks. This all makes sense. I had no trouble with immediate interference on a ground ball, and if its unintentional and costs the defense a chance at a double play, that's too bad. It was fly balls I couldn't get straight, especially with runners far off their bases.
I will take "no runners may advance" to mean that if the batter or a runner interferes with a fielder attempting to field a batted ball, then anyone not called out goes back to the base at TOP, no matter how far he had advanced before the interference. It was an ASA case/test play that made me look to OBR for justification for sending runners back: No outs, Abel on 3B, Baker on 2B, Charles on 1B. Daniels pops up near the 1B line and runs into F3, knocking the ball loose to prevent a double play. Abel has touched home plate prior to the collision. The answer is: Dead ball, Daniels is out, Baker is out, Charles is returned to 1B, Abel scores. Yes, it's true. (I substituted names for R1, R2, etc.)
__________________
greymule More whiskey—and fresh horses for my men! Roll Tide! |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Runner interference versus umpire interference | Jay R | Baseball | 1 | Thu Apr 28, 2005 07:00pm |
interference??? | slowballbaker | Softball | 13 | Fri Apr 15, 2005 09:37pm |
Interference | WinterWillie | Softball | 6 | Tue Aug 03, 2004 12:13pm |
Interference | WinterWillie | Softball | 3 | Sat Jul 17, 2004 12:27pm |
Interference | Larry | Softball | 5 | Thu Jun 06, 2002 09:31am |