The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 16, 2006, 12:18pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 4,222
[QUOTE=GoodwillRef]
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteBooth
[I]


I agree that we should have replay and only for plays such as home run/no home run and fair/foul calls? I am not advocating using it for judgement calls.
Those are judgement calls.
__________________
GB
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 16, 2006, 01:09pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Garth, *snicker*, you slay me.

Baseball will have replay when a sufficient number of wealthy owners get sufficiently pissed by bad calls to bring it about. I don't see this happening very soon.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 16, 2006, 01:16pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 4,222
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron

Baseball will have replay when a sufficient number of wealthy owners get sufficiently pissed by bad calls to bring it about. I don't see this happening very soon.
I've had a former ML player tell me that when Angel Hernandez boots a fair/foul call that costs Steinbrenner the World Series, instant replay will debut the next season.
__________________
GB
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 16, 2006, 01:19pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by GarthB
I've had a former ML player tell me that when Angel Hernandez boots a fair/foul call that costs Steinbrenner the World Series, instant replay will debut the next season.
So, what you're saying is that it will never happen, since Angel will never be placed in that situation, right?
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 16, 2006, 01:26pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 4,222
Quote:
Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve
So, what you're saying is that it will never happen, since Angel will never be placed in that situation, right?
You give baseball too much credit. Remember, Angel worked the 2002 and 2005 World Series.
__________________
GB
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 16, 2006, 01:29pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by GarthB
You give baseball too much credit. Remember, Angel worked the 2002 and 2005 World Series.
Yes, but I was hoping they had learned their lesson!
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 16, 2006, 01:35pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,577
To keep this on the Cards/Mets theme, anyone else catch McCarver's comments that (RE: balks):

1. F1 has to come set for at least "1-thousand one", and
2. F1 has to come set with his glove in the same position for every pitch?


I thought the 1-second rule died before I was born.....
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 16, 2006, 05:42pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by GarthB
I've had a former ML player tell me that when Angel Hernandez boots a fair/foul call that costs Steinbrenner the World Series, instant replay will debut the next season.
EXACTLY.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 16, 2006, 02:05pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Racine, Wisconsin
Posts: 1,081
[QUOTE=GarthB]
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoodwillRef

Those are judgement calls.

You know what I mean I don't think it should be used for out/safe or ball/strike type of calls. You guys take everything so literally. Fair/foul, homerun/no homerun, fan interference, those types of situations.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 16, 2006, 02:11pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Greater Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 611
Send a message via Yahoo to umpduck11
[QUOTE=GoodwillRef]
Quote:
Originally Posted by GarthB


You know what I mean I don't think it should be used for out/safe or ball/strike type of calls. You guys take everything so literally. Fair/foul, homerun/no homerun, fan interference, those types of situations.
It's a slippery slope from fair/foul to ball/strike.
__________________
All generalizations are bad. - R.H. Grenier
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 16, 2006, 02:23pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 4,222
[QUOTE=GoodwillRef]
Quote:
Originally Posted by GarthB


You know what I mean I don't think it should be used for out/safe or ball/strike type of calls. You guys take everything so literally. Fair/foul, homerun/no homerun, fan interference, those types of situations.

No, I didn't know what you meant. I didn't know if you knew what you meant. I knew what you wrote.

I am not familiar with you as a poster or as an umpire, and I do not know what you do or do not understand.

Okay, let's take fair/foul situations Will this include whether or not the ball might have hit the batter in the box after hitting the bat and before rolling "fair"? Or do you need to further refine this judgement call?
__________________
GB
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 16, 2006, 03:15pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,198
[QUOTE=GarthB]
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoodwillRef


No, I didn't know what you meant. I didn't know if you knew what you meant. I knew what you wrote.

I am not familiar with you as a poster or as an umpire, and I do not know what you do or do not understand.

Okay, let's take fair/foul situations Will this include whether or not the ball might have hit the batter in the box after hitting the bat and before rolling "fair"? Or do you need to further refine this judgement call?
I'd also like to know what will happen if an umpire declares the ball to be "foul" and replay shows it is "fair"? Where will the runners be placed?
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 16, 2006, 03:32pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
I would like to know why everyone has suddenly forgotten how to use the quotation features correctly, so here's a review:

[quote] must be followed by a close of quotation, which is a / before the word quote.

Like this:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Somebody
What you want to quote
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 16, 2006, 03:40pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 4,222
[QUOTE=SanDiegoSteve]I would like to know why everyone has suddenly forgotten how to use the quotation features correctly, so here's a review:

Quote:
must be followed by a close of quotation, which is a / before the word quote.

Like this:
I merely hit the "quote button" and how it comes out is how it comes out.

Edited to add: See how screwed up it is this time? There must be an issue with the "quote button" feature. Trust me, Bob and I aren't screwing this up in purpose.
__________________
GB
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 16, 2006, 03:52pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Washington State
Posts: 209
Previewed

Quote:
Originally Posted by GarthB
Quote:
Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve
I would like to know why everyone has suddenly forgotten how to use the quotation features correctly, so here's a review:



I merely hit the "quote button" and how it comes out is how it comes out.

Edited to add: See how screwed up it is this time? There must be an issue with the "quote button" feature. Trust me, Bob and I aren't screwing this up in purpose.
Hmm. Quoting a quote seems to get things messed up. The result of the Quote button here had two Quote tags (one for GarthB, one for SanDiegoSteve) and one /Quote end tag. It was messed up. I manually added a second /Quote end tag and things appear to be better. At least, the preview looks OK.
__________________
-LilLeaguer
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mets/Dodgers SanDiegoSteve Baseball 11 Thu Oct 05, 2006 08:44am
Braves V Mets May 7th PanamaCityBrian Baseball 16 Mon May 08, 2006 10:38pm
Mets vs Braves bbump82 Baseball 6 Thu May 26, 2005 10:26am
Cards-Mets, 8/8 - Failure to retouch bigwes68 Baseball 2 Tue Aug 10, 2004 07:49am
Astros-Mets YoungRighty Baseball 9 Mon May 17, 2004 05:33pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:11pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1