The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sat Sep 16, 2006, 04:41pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,577
Just remember

Things would be different if it leads to an unfair advantage. Those manufacturers make a ton of money on baseball. MLB and LL are in business to make money and these rules are made with other financial reasons in mind and can change on whim over time. A six year old girl may want to place a decal on her helmet to differentiate her helmet from all the others. I wouldn't concern myself with MOST of the fine print. She still has to reach first base. I can't wait for those high STIRRUP socks and white cleats to make a comeback. I think it would lower some of the current MLB ERA's. Did you see Pedro cry the other day?

Last edited by SAump; Sat Sep 16, 2006 at 04:45pm.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sat Sep 16, 2006, 05:19pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Nobody said that a laminated bat is a painted bat.

Laminated bats are not allowed. Bats painted by the consumer are not allowed. The rule doesn't mean that you can't use a bat painted at the factory. Some people do paint their bats with regular old paint, right from the can. That is what the rule is prohibiting. That's why the rule said that colored bats are legal. They were painted at the factory, and therefore legal.
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sat Sep 16, 2006, 06:43pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 362
Quote:
Originally Posted by PWL
All bats do not come from the factory. If you mean the factory to be a little independent bat maker that works out of their garage. I know of at least three people that turn bats.

Are you referring to paint or stain? No one paints their bats at the "factory". They stain them. They can use a clear stain. I simply gave the definition of what is a laminated bat. When was the last time you ruled a bat illegal for a "paint job"? Probably never.
we are talking about "factory", the makers of the bat. Meaning its done before it ever hits the shelves.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sun Sep 17, 2006, 09:37am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Bend, In.
Posts: 2,192
Send a message via AIM to BigUmp56 Send a message via Yahoo to BigUmp56
Well, he doesn't speak for all umpires working LL, I can tell you that. I don't know of any of the umpires in the LL association I belong to that would subscribe to his ideaology. If a situation were to arise where a question about a players eligbility needed to be addressed the most we would do is advise them of the appropriate rule. I'm not checking birth certificates any more than I would do a freaking cup check.



Tim.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sun Sep 17, 2006, 11:16am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Washington State
Posts: 209
All I'm asking for

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigUmp56
Well, he doesn't speak for all umpires working LL, I can tell you that. I don't know of any of the umpires in the LL association I belong to that would subscribe to his ideaology. If a situation were to arise where a question about a players eligbility needed to be addressed the most we would do is advise them of the appropriate rule. I'm not checking birth certificates any more than I would do a freaking cup check.

Tim.
We almost agree. I think the Little League umpire should advise the manager of the appropriate rule; you admit that an umpire might do so.

I explicitely don't think that umpires should be checking birth certificates or cups.

And, of course, I don't speak for anybody but myself, though I'm relaying rules and responsibilities straight from the Little League book.
__________________
-LilLeaguer
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sun Sep 17, 2006, 11:25am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 4,222
Quote:
Originally Posted by LilLeaguer
We almost agree. I think the Little League umpire should advise the manager of the appropriate rule; you admit that an umpire might do so.

I explicitely don't think that umpires should be checking birth certificates or cups.

And, of course, I don't speak for anybody but myself, though I'm relaying rules and responsibilities straight from the Little League book.
Good Lord, you can't read.

What you said: "I think the Little League umpire should advise the manager of the appropriate rule; you admit that an umpire might do so."

What BU really said: "If a situation were to arise where a question about a players eligbility needed to be addressed the most we woulddo is advise them of the appropriate rule."

You have done the impossible. You got me to defend BU.
__________________
GB
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Sun Sep 17, 2006, 11:34am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Washington State
Posts: 209
I still can't read

Quote:
Originally Posted by GarthB
Good Lord, you can't read.

What you said: "I think the Little League umpire should advise the manager of the appropriate rule; you admit that an umpire might do so."

What BU really said: "If a situation were to arise where a question about a players eligbility needed to be addressed the most we woulddo is advise them of the appropriate rule."

You have done the impossible. You got me to defend BU.
Sorry for the public message, but you seem to have PM turned off.

Given a situation where a protest is imminent, the facts are not in dispute, and it's about player eligibility, I think the umpire has three choices:
  1. He should feel required to know the rules and communicate them before the offending play happens (LL)
  2. If he knows the rules, the most he would do is communicate them before the offending play happens (BU)
  3. He shouldn't know the rules, and he certainly shouldn't communicate them. (RF)
In my judgement, positions 1 and 2 are almost in agreement, at least when compared with 3. That is all I was saying.
__________________
-LilLeaguer
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Sun Sep 17, 2006, 06:42pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigUmp56
Well, he doesn't speak for all umpires working LL, I can tell you that. I don't know of any of the umpires in the LL association I belong to that would subscribe to his ideaology.
Am I the only one here that knows that LilLeaguer is a woman?
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Sun Sep 17, 2006, 07:02pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,107
thats news to me
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Sun Sep 17, 2006, 07:36pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Yes, and it's twice I've mentioned it now.
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Sun Sep 17, 2006, 09:10pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Washington State
Posts: 209
It's my fault

Quote:
Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve
Am I the only one here that knows that LilLeaguer is a woman?
I think I signed a few of my earliest posts Lil, but to the extent that it matters, or that you should believe a stranger on the internet, I'm:

Russ Paul-Jones (M)
__________________
-LilLeaguer
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Sun Sep 17, 2006, 10:41pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Greater Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 611
Send a message via Yahoo to umpduck11
Quote:
Originally Posted by LilLeaguer
I think I signed a few of my earliest posts Lil, but to the extent that it matters, or that you should believe a stranger on the internet, I'm:

Russ Paul-Jones (M)
How strange......she has male names.
__________________
All generalizations are bad. - R.H. Grenier
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Sun Sep 17, 2006, 09:13pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,577
Talking Have you met her?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve
Am I the only one here that knows that LilLeaguer is a woman?
Or are you making up this crap? Sorry, I lost my water laughing so hard.

Last edited by SAump; Sun Sep 17, 2006 at 09:17pm.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Sun Sep 17, 2006, 09:21pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 768
Quote:
Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve
Am I the only one here that knows that LilLeaguer is a woman?
I noticed he used feminine pronouns in one of his post, speaking of a hypothetical umpire. I guess you saw that post as well and assumed that made him a woman. It appears that is not the case.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Sun Sep 17, 2006, 09:46pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 141
Send a message via Yahoo to jxt127
Saw a lot of wood bats this weekend in a youth tournament.

Black, brown, ash. Even one with tape wrapped all around the barrel. Of course there were a lot less bats left at the end of the tournament than at the start.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A question on a play and a mechanics question. aevans410 Baseball 11 Mon May 12, 2008 09:23am
Rule Question and Mechanics Question Stair-Climber Softball 15 Fri May 06, 2005 06:44am
Over the back Question? Sorry mistyped my first question CoaachJF Basketball 15 Thu Feb 27, 2003 03:18pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:26am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1