Again the media sets it straight!

[GarthB]

Originally Posted by scott1231

Her: "Well ... It's really slow."
Me: "Slow? What do you mean?"
Her: "It seemed like it took you forEVER to call a strike."
Me: "Nah, hon ... it just seems like forever."
Her: "Really. I've never seen that before. It made you look like you were hesitant, not sure of your call."
Me: "Well, kinda hesitating. I look at the pitch, retrace it quickly, quietly say "yes" to the catcher and hitter, and bang it."
Her: "It just looks stupid, you calling a strike when the ball is going back to the pitcher. Didn't anyone else complain?"
Me: "No, in fact the catchers liked it that I said 'yes' before banging it."
Her: "Well, it looks stupid, but you must have had good game. I didn't hear anyone in the stands say anything about your zone."

Okay, maybe that wasn't word-for-word, and more of a compilation of conversations we had this past season ... but you get the idea.

Did it make me aware that the perception was that our mechanic is slow? Yes.
Did I change my timing because of her perception? No.
Did I get batters running off or head-whipping? No.

I'm pretty sure it was actually my wife writing that article under a pseudonym.

The thought that, by using proper timing on ball/strike calls, we are trying to draw attention to ourselves or that we are adding to the time of the game is ridiculous.

Timing is proper use of the eyes...not hesitation.

[BigUmp56]

Originally Posted by GarthB

Timing is proper use of the eyes...not hesitation.

It's both.


Tim.

[Tim C]

"It's both."

And I respectfully disagree.

As Evans teaches it if you track the ball correctly and then make the decision and then make the call it is a smooth process that DOES NOT INCLUDE any "hesitation."

False "hesitation" such as being dicussed in this thread is not anything to do with the timing of a correct call.

Regards,

[GarthB]

Originally Posted by Tim C

"It's both."

And I respectfully disagree.

As Evans teaches it if you track the ball correctly and then make the decision and then make the call it is a smooth process that DOES NOT INCLUDE any "hesitation."

False "hesitation" such as being dicussed in this thread is not anything to do with the timing of a correct call.

Regards,

Thank you, Tee...saved me many keystrokes.

[ctblu40]

Originally Posted by Tim C

"It's both."

And I respectfully disagree.

As Evans teaches it if you track the ball correctly and then make the decision and then make the call it is a smooth process that DOES NOT INCLUDE any "hesitation."

False "hesitation" such as being dicussed in this thread is not anything to do with the timing of a correct call.

Regards,

Tee,

This is as good an explanation of timing as I've ever heard... I'll be sure to use this next time a new umpire asks me what timing is. Well done!

[GarthB]

Originally Posted by ctblu40

Tee,

This is as good an explanation of timing as I've ever heard... I'll be sure to use this next time a new umpire asks me what timing is. Well done!

It is the description used at the Academy. Tee has explained it well. Timing has nothing to do with pausing, hesitating, replaying, counting one-mississippi, whispering to the batter or catcher or straightening your cup.

[SanDiegoSteve]

Thanks a lot Garth, now I have to drop that cup straightening from my strike call. Just great.

[mbyron]

In fact, even the idea of 'timing' might be out of place. Evans's emphasis on "proper use of the eyes" is surely the right way to go, and if that's your focus, you don't need to worry about 'timing' at all. Using your eyes properly will guarantee that you do not call pitches too fast; the Philadelphia media will get on your case if you call them too slowly.