The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 14, 2006, 11:07am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 236
Rich ...............

[QUOTE=Rich Ives]
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteBooth
[I]


What's to hard about 7.14?

A special pinch runner (SPR) can be used once per inning.

The SPR has to be a player who isn't in the current lineup.

You can only run for someone once per game.

How complicated is that?
7.14 reads player who has not appeared in the batting order, not who isn't in the current lineup. There is a big difference, especially later in a game.




Doug
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 14, 2006, 12:22pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,236
[QUOTE=Carbide Keyman]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Ives

7.14 reads player who has not appeared in the batting order, not who isn't in the current lineup. There is a big difference, especially later in a game.




Doug
The rule was changed in 2005 - get a current book.


7.14 -- Once each inning, a team may utilize a player who is not in the batting order as a special pinch-runner for any offensive player. A player may only be removed for a pinch runner one time during a game. The player for whom the pinch-runner runs is not subject to removal from the lineup. If the pinch runner remains in the game as a substitute defensive or offensive player, that player may not be used again as a pinch-runner while in the batting order. However, if removed for another substitute that player or any player not in the lineup, is again eligible to be used as a pinch runner.
__________________
Rich Ives
Different does not equate to wrong

Last edited by Rich Ives; Wed Jun 14, 2006 at 12:30pm.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 14, 2006, 02:24pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 49
Most misunderstood rule(s) by coaches:

1. They think the hands are a part of the bat when a batter gets hit there thus making it in play or a foul ball depending on where it ends up.

2. They think the runner has the right to the "base path" when the fielder is in the process of fielding the ball.

3. They think a third to first pick-off is a balk.

4. They think runners have to slide at home plate no matter what, even if the catcher catches the ball 10 feet up the line and tags the kid coming around third out, they say he still has to slide and needs to be objected.

5. They think the players can't touch a player before he touches home plate when he hits a home run.

6. They think if the catcher catches the ball good, it's a strike...no matter if he is set up a foot outside.

Alright, I'm just complaining now so I'll stop.

Luke
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 14, 2006, 02:27pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,577
Quote:
Originally Posted by lmathews19
they say he still has to slide and needs to be objected.
I'm with them...I hate to be objectified.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 14, 2006, 03:21pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 49
Quote:
Originally Posted by LMan
I'm with them...I hate to be objectified.
I would like to know your rationale for this. It's impossible for this to happen. Many rules state that the players have to slide to avoid contact, but a mandatory slide rule at home plate is ridiculous if you ask me. And in this sitch, sliding halfway down the line 10-15 feet from the plate just to avoid getting ejected borders the line of a stupid rule.
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 14, 2006, 03:32pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 224
Send a message via AIM to akalsey Send a message via Yahoo to akalsey
He was making fun of your butchering of the English language. Last season I objected to a lot of players, but I only ejected two.
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 14, 2006, 03:45pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 49
Ooh, I see it now. I meant "ejected" LMan. I should have known that any chance to smart-off on this board people get they take it. My fault LMan, "ejected"...I'll be sure to proof-read my next post that I write for your sake.
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 15, 2006, 07:15am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,577
Yeah, I'm terrible that way....ya gotta both give it and take it around here.
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 15, 2006, 08:21am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 236
How Rude ! ...............................

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Ives

The rule was changed in 2005 - get a current book.[/I]
First, thank you for the correction. Second, I'm glad I was able to make you feel so superior with your little editorial comment. You must feel 10 feet tall now !

Doug
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 15, 2006, 10:09am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carbide Keyman
First, thank you for the correction. Second, I'm glad I was able to make you feel so superior with your little editorial comment. You must feel 10 feet tall now !

Doug
And I'm so happy that you were smug enough to post an outdated rule to show me I was wrong.

There are rules changes every year. You really need to keep up with them.
__________________
Rich Ives
Different does not equate to wrong
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 15, 2006, 10:16am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 236
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Ives
And I'm so happy that you were smug enough to post an outdated rule to show me I was wrong.

There are rules changes every year. You really need to keep up with them.
And I'm so happy that you get to continue to prove what a pompous *** you are. I'm glad you are never, ever wrong.


Doug
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 15, 2006, 10:22am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,577
He may be pompous, but at least he doesn't objectify!




Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 15, 2006, 10:38am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 236
Quote:
Originally Posted by LMan
He may be pompous, but at least he doesn't objectify!





We all have our own faults, some worse than others. I'm glad you called me on it, LMan.



Doug
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 15, 2006, 11:51am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Washington
Posts: 1,491
Send a message via AIM to RPatrino Send a message via Yahoo to RPatrino
Careful, you might get objected from this board.
__________________
Bob P.

-----------------------
We are stewards of baseball. Our customers aren't schools or coaches or conferences. Our customer is the game itself.
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 15, 2006, 03:12pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carbide Keyman
And I'm so happy that you get to continue to prove what a pompous *** you are. I'm glad you are never, ever wrong.


Doug
If I don't know the answer I don't reply. Simple method.
__________________
Rich Ives
Different does not equate to wrong
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Coaches rule CTom Basketball 15 Mon Jun 27, 2005 09:36am
Coaches, please read the rule book Adam Basketball 37 Wed Feb 23, 2005 09:34am
coaches challenge rule in the nfl trainerlee Football 6 Fri Oct 01, 2004 05:46am
Coaches' Rule Luv4Asian8 Basketball 1 Tue Dec 09, 2003 10:43pm
Most misunderstood rule coachgrd Basketball 22 Wed Nov 06, 2002 10:51pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:18am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1