|
Tue Jun 05, 2007, 01:58pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
JR, there are not a lot of tools in the tool box here
Yes, I agree with you, testing is not a great alternative here. It is your praxsis that matters.
But as a point of fact, how do you determine fitness for umpiring, on the FED or NCAA level? Here is the list as far as I know, in no order: 1. Evaluation by trained evaluators 2. Coaches' Vote 3. Umpires' Vote 4. Rules/Mechanics Testing 5. Tape Evaluation 6. Reputation 7. Written Recommendations 8. Random Chance 9. Senority 10. # of games worked 11. Other (#of ejections?, player evaluations? I don't know?) We all agree #1 is best, then possibly #5 is 2nd best. What is #3 on the list? IMO its testing. You tell me. 
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| classification/rating | umpduck11 | Baseball | 6 | Fri Jan 07, 2005 03:31pm |
| Rating officials | cowbyfan1 | Football | 2 | Thu Nov 11, 2004 11:15am |
| Rating Cards | brandan89 | Basketball | 17 | Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:54am |
| Rating Systems | mikesears | Football | 15 | Thu Sep 02, 2004 02:41pm |
| Evaluating Systems | doghead | Basketball | 9 | Mon Dec 08, 2003 07:29pm |
Threaded Mode
