The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 08, 2006, 03:49pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Bend, In.
Posts: 2,192
Send a message via AIM to BigUmp56 Send a message via Yahoo to BigUmp56
Mask Weight

I'm looking to see if any of you know how much of a weight difference there is between the +POS AUL300 and the Honigs K91.


Thanks,


Tim.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 08, 2006, 04:28pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigUmp56
I'm looking to see if any of you know how much of a weight difference there is between the +POS AUL300 and the Honigs K91.
You really are quite the gear ho, ain't ya?
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 08, 2006, 08:30pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Bend, In.
Posts: 2,192
Send a message via AIM to BigUmp56 Send a message via Yahoo to BigUmp56
Quote:
Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve
You really are quite the gear ho, ain't ya?
Well, I know guys who are worse. I went back to a traditional style mask this season and cracked my old mask last Saturday. Sunday at our association meeting a friend of mine showed me his +POS AUL300. It was light as all get out and really got my attention. The problem is I contacted +POS today and they said they had the mask and harness available but the pads were on back order until sometime in the middle of June. The only replacement pads available were two tone red/navy......YUK!! The Honigs is in stock, so I thought if any one knew how the two compared I would order one if there were some favorable responses.


Tim.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 08, 2006, 08:52pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 652
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigUmp56
Well, I know guys who are worse. I went back to a traditional style mask this season and cracked my old mask last Saturday. Sunday at our association meeting a friend of mine showed me his +POS AUL300. It was light as all get out and really got my attention. The problem is I contacted +POS today and they said they had the mask and harness available but the pads were on back order until sometime in the middle of June. The only replacement pads available were two tone red/navy......YUK!! The Honigs is in stock, so I thought if any one knew how the two compared I would order one if there were some favorable responses.


Tim.
Just my two cents, but a LOT of MLB guys seem to be wearing the All-Star I-Bar Vision Frame.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 08, 2006, 08:53pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Bend, In.
Posts: 2,192
Send a message via AIM to BigUmp56 Send a message via Yahoo to BigUmp56
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrm21711
Just my two cents, but a LOT of MLB guys seem to be wearing the All-Star I-Bar Vision Frame.
Do you have a link so I can check it out?


Tim.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 08, 2006, 09:02pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,107
i just tried to weigh my AUL on two different scales and got nothing, so it weighs nothing at all -- thats pretty favorable. seriously though, i have held both masks (only used the AUL though) and can say that i noticed the AUL to be a bit lighter. however, with their lack of padding, and the typical turn around time; you might be better off getting the honigs mask.

also, +POS has never actually had the pads that i want in the three masks ive bought from them.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 08, 2006, 09:03pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,107
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigUmp56
Do you have a link so I can check it out?


Tim.
if you do get that mask, id suggest getting a separate harness because the harness that comes with this mask is rubber and is meant to grip onto a catchers helmet. i dont have a link, cant remember where its from.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 08, 2006, 10:03pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 652
Quote:
Originally Posted by briancurtin
if you do get that mask, id suggest getting a separate harness because the harness that comes with this mask is rubber and is meant to grip onto a catchers helmet. i dont have a link, cant remember where its from.
BTL Officials Gear carries it: http://www.btlofficialsgear.com/deta...&category=1375

Its so cheap there, you could easily buy another harness and Wilson mask pads (Davis has the amara suede pads for $26 or so) and it would still be cheaper than the Chrome Moliben Mask. There are a large number of MLB guys wearing this frame, so you gotta presume its the best out there.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 08, 2006, 10:48pm
ggk ggk is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 140
best mask

i'm also looking to upgrade to the best mask i can find - lightweight.
does the low profile of the Wilson Chrome Moliben Alloy Cage really make a difference??

the all start i bar sounds like a great deal. how does that compare to the wilson chrome as far as weight??
thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 08, 2006, 10:59pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,107
i hate 'low profile' masks. i used one a few times as a catcher and used one once when i was like 15 as an umpire (it was a cheapo rawlings one). i didnt feel there was an advantage and it just felt weird using a mask that looked like it was run over by a truck
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 10, 2006, 09:18pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 192
Low Pro Chrome Moliben vs Honig's Double Bar

I have both. I think the weight is similar but the Moliben (whatever the $%@* that is) does let you see better, in my opinion. Especially on low pitches. Just my two cents. I got it with black doeskin and just got the black amara suede pads from Gerry Davis Sports last week. Done about three games with the suede on the Moliben. Not too hot yet but I feel the difference. Really nice. I have been getting several positive comments on my strike zone and I really think it is mostly the mask combined with a couple of tweaks to my stance (GDS) and early lock in. I have taken several (five or six) balls off the mask and no dents just scratches and nicks. No headaches or jaw probs, etc. One of them was the first scrimmage in Mid-March with a pitcher throwing low 90's. Lots of foul balls that day. I only caught two of them-shin and facemask. I recommend the Moliben. Oh yeah, I only paid $49 for it as it wasn't in the seller's database yet on my date of purchase and they went ahead and sold it to me as the Wilson dynalite. Lucky, lucky me.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 11, 2006, 11:43am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 301
How Dare you talk about better vision. They can see just fine with the Traditional Masks, even if a traditional mask is imporved, vision is NOT important. If you bring that up again you could get banned. LOL
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 11, 2006, 01:55pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by MajorDave
I have both. I think the weight is similar but the Moliben (whatever the $%@* that is) does let you see better, in my opinion.
Chrome Molybdenum is the correct designation. It is an alloy containing Chromium and Molybdenum which is used in the manufacture of racing wheels, golf clubs, and now apparently umpire/catcher masks. Better known as Chrome Moly.
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 12, 2006, 12:00pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 192
Moliben + Molybdenum?

Thanks SDS for the science lesson. I remember Molybdenum as being on the periodic table of elements from my HS/College science class days but I have never seen or dealt with it. I wonder how they got the shortened name as noted above from the original element name? Anyway, back to the point. I think it is a pretty good mask. It is my number one and I only keep the Honig's as a back up.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 12, 2006, 12:57pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
I think that they figured that Chrome Moly would be associated with car wheels so they used a different shortened name.......Moliben. Who'd a guessed?

Or I could be totally off base here (and subject to being tagged out) and maybe Moliben is a new alloy of which I am unfamiliar. Someone with superior intellect, such as JRutledge perhaps , may have the definitive answer.
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Light weight Plate Shoe whiskers_ump Softball 10 Mon Apr 19, 2004 02:58pm
Weight a whoa! mick Basketball 23 Fri Apr 12, 2002 10:06am
weight and height tallref Basketball 2 Wed Feb 27, 2002 04:38pm
ULTRA LIGHT WEIGHT MASKS umpire General / Off-Topic 1 Wed Jul 25, 2001 11:28am
FED Bat weight TB Baseball 24 Sat May 05, 2001 08:14am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:40am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1