The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 06, 2006, 08:04am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,729
NFHS BR/RL Inter

National Federation of High School Rules

r2 and r3
Less than two outs

Batter performs a "safety squeeze" and bunts the ball up the first base line.

Ball is 6" FOUL and as F1 bends over to knock it "further foul" but has not touched the ball(i.e. touching ball foul so it won't roll back to fair ground) the BR runs into him.

You make the call!

Regards,

Last edited by Tim C; Sat May 06, 2006 at 09:58am.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 06, 2006, 09:35am
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,785
Besides "FOUL," what call would anyone actually want to make?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 06, 2006, 12:19pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,226
If the ball had no chance of becoming fair, it's FOUL.

If it did have a chance to roll fair, it's INT.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 06, 2006, 03:48pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 355
Send a message via AIM to NFump
Where did the ball end up?
__________________
Just where are those dang keys?!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 06, 2006, 04:02pm
DG DG is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 4,022
Quote:
Originally Posted by bossman72
If the ball had no chance of becoming fair, it's FOUL.

If it did have a chance to roll fair, it's INT.
This sounds correct, but I have found no FED rule or case book play on it. Closest thing is 8-4-1d, which is talking about contacting a batted ball in foul territory with the bat while it has a chance of becoming fair. The definition of Offensive Interference would make it illegal to contact a fielder making a play on a ball, but there is no play to be made on a foul ball. 10-2-3g might have to be applied here to declare the batter out, and all runners return to base at TOI.

I would have be CERTAIN that the ball had a chance to become fair, ie rolling towards fair with enough roll to make it there to make this call.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 06, 2006, 04:07pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 355
Send a message via AIM to NFump
Quote:
Originally Posted by DG
This sounds correct, but I have found no FED rule or case book play on it. Closest thing is 8-4-1d, which is talking about contacting a batted ball in foul territory with the bat while it has a chance of becoming fair. The definition of Offensive Interference would make it illegal to contact a fielder making a play on a ball, but there is no play to be made on a foul ball. 10-2-3g might have to be applied here to declare the batter out, and all runners return to base at TOI.

I would have be CERTAIN that the ball had a chance to become fair, ie rolling towards fair with enough roll to make it there to make this call.
That was my point DG about where did the ball end up. Like you said you'd better be ABSOLUTELY CERTAIN the ball will end up fair before you make an int call. As the sitch said the ball was never touched you'd have to wait until it stopped or was touched.
__________________
Just where are those dang keys?!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 06, 2006, 04:17pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 43
I agree that it *makes sense* to look at where the ball ends up, but offensive interference is not a delayed dead ball situation. Theoretically, the call would need to be made immediately, so what happens after that point would be irrelevant. Having said that, I still don't have a better solution. Personally, I've probably got a foul ball.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 06, 2006, 06:18pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 77
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Fronheiser
Besides "FOUL," what call would anyone actually want to make?
How about ... Malicious contact. Out and out! Runners return. Eh?
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 06, 2006, 08:47pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thom Coste
How about ... Malicious contact. Out and out! Runners return. Eh?
You have a very dark sense of humor, don't you?
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
looking for inter. dave58 Basketball 5 Thu Feb 16, 2006 08:39pm
OBR 7.07 vs NFHS 8-3-1c Peruvian Baseball 9 Tue Jan 04, 2005 01:12am
NEW - 2003 NFHS Football Rule Changes (as written by the NFHS Rules Committee) KWH Football 27 Tue Jan 21, 2003 11:30am
NFHS POE #3 BktBallRef Basketball 19 Fri Jun 28, 2002 12:10am
rule inter. dclark Football 2 Wed Oct 17, 2001 08:16am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:17pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1