The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Apr 27, 2006, 11:52am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 54
Thought I knew this one, but now...I am confused.


If a runner has contact with a legally occupied base when he hinders a fielder attempting to make a play on a batted ball, the runner shall not be called out unless, in the umpire's judgment, such hindrance, whether it occurs on fair or foul territory, is intentional.

So, if R3 is making every effort to bend, twist, step out out of the way of the fielder...and somehow a twisting, windblown batted ball strikes R3....he is not out.

But absent that type of effort, he is out?

So just standing there like a statue is "intentional"....and ducking over, not even trying to follow the ball is "intentional"?

Does this sound about right?

Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Apr 27, 2006, 01:54pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,186
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmcramer
Thought I knew this one, but now...I am confused.


If a runner has contact with a legally occupied base when he hinders a fielder attempting to make a play on a batted ball, the runner shall not be called out unless, in the umpire's judgment, such hindrance, whether it occurs on fair or foul territory, is intentional.

So, if R3 is making every effort to bend, twist, step out out of the way of the fielder...and somehow a twisting, windblown batted ball strikes R3....he is not out.

But absent that type of effort, he is out?

So just standing there like a statue is "intentional"....and ducking over, not even trying to follow the ball is "intentional"?

Does this sound about right?

Thanks!
Not correct.

As always, there's a difference between "interfering" with the ball and "interfering" with the fielder.

Unless it's an infield fly, the base is never protection from "interfering" with the ball..

The base is protection from "interfering" with the fielder, unless it's intentional.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu Apr 27, 2006, 02:38pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 54
Got it now.

Thank you, Bob!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 21, 2007, 01:45pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 283
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins
As always, there's a difference between "interfering" with the ball and "interfering" with the fielder.

Unless it's an infield fly, the base is never protection from "interfering" with the ball..

The base is protection from "interfering" with the fielder, unless it's intentional.
Well stated.

One thing that confuses players is that in softball (generally), the base is protection from interfering with the ball. A lot of players have never actually read the rule book, which results in rules 'migrating' from one sport to another.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
runner nudged off base, then hit by batted ball chuck chopper Softball 1 Wed Oct 19, 2005 03:03pm
Little League 9-10 yr old - Base runner hit by batted ball... Do runners advance? mike miles Baseball 2 Thu Jul 21, 2005 08:46am
Base Runner Hit With Batted Ball - ASA chiquita Softball 5 Thu Jun 30, 2005 08:28am
ball batted twice coreyboy Softball 3 Wed Jun 11, 2003 09:56am
Runner hit with batted ball while ON a base. walkerbard Softball 7 Tue Jun 04, 2002 08:03am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:47pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1