The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old Tue Nov 22, 2005, 12:23am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Edinburg, TX
Posts: 1,212
Send a message via ICQ to Carl Childress
Re: Re: Hmm,

Quote:
Originally posted by Pete in AZ
Quote:
Originally posted by Tim C
No, but being a coach means you can add nothing to a discussion, or website, that is for umpires.

T

~sigh~

That post sounds awfully condescending and arrogant.

Sometimes it is just too easy.

What was the line? Oh yeah, "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone." This seems like a remarkable turn of events.
Someone pointed out this is bad grammar. It is, but at first glance it seems correct.

The subject of the verb "cast" is the nominative pronoun "he."

But on closer review:

"Cast" is not the verb in this sentence. It's an infinitive, with the sign of the infinitive ("to") understood.

Since the subject of an infinitive is in the objective case (strange but true), the correct pronoun is "him."

Let (Allow) him who is without sin (to) cast the first stone.

And, you gotta admit, "let him" sounds better than "let he."

A sentence without an adjective clause (who is without sin) makes the point clearer:

Let her make the money.
Let them run the company.
Let him cast the first stone.

Finally, here's a sentence that shows how the subject of an infinitive, even with the sign, must be in the objective case:

I wanted her to go. (Naturally, we wouldn't say: I wanted she to go.)
That sentence, parsed, is: Subject (I) Verb (wanted) Direct Object (her to go).

Ah.... He didn't want "her." He wanted "her to go."

Truth to tell, this is more fun than discussing verbal obstruction.

Grammar: Now that's where it's at.

Oh, does that sentence end with a preposition?

Churchill said: "That's something up with which I will not put!"
__________________
Papa C
My website
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old Tue Nov 22, 2005, 03:30am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 329
Re: Re: Re: Hmm,

Quote:
Originally posted by Carl Childress

Truth to tell, this is more fun than discussing verbal obstruction.

Possibly, but I am put in mind of James Thurber's essay entitled "Here lies Miss Groby" in which he commented about his teacher of English composition: "It wasn't what prose said that interested Miss Groby; it was the way prose said it. The shape of a sentence crucified on a blackboard (parsed, she called it) brought a light to her eye."

I enjoyed the grammar lesson, but let's not extend it to diagramming sentences, OK?

[I can't remember if the title of an essay should be underlined or enclosed in quotation marks. But on an Internet site, underlining means something else anyway.]

Dave Reed
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old Tue Nov 22, 2005, 09:58am
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Dave, I believe italicized would be appropriate for titles.
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old Tue Nov 22, 2005, 10:07am
JJ JJ is offline
Veteran College Umpire
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: IN
Posts: 1,122
Quote:

He's also teaching an honors Humanities class. Yesterday, they began work on 15th-century Italian art, architecture, music, painting, and sculpture.

What did you do yesterday? [/B]
I raked my yard with my daughter. In the great scheme of things, I wonder what was more valuable?

JJ
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old Tue Nov 22, 2005, 10:28am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally posted by JJ
Quote:

He's also teaching an honors Humanities class. Yesterday, they began work on 15th-century Italian art, architecture, music, painting, and sculpture.

What did you do yesterday?
I raked my yard with my daughter. In the great scheme of things, I wonder what was more valuable?

JJ [/B]
I don't presume to know the great scheme (or the Great Scheme, if there is one). But I do agree with Keynes, that in the long run we are all dead. Hope that's on-topic.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)  
Old Tue Nov 22, 2005, 08:55pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 4,222
Quote:
Originally posted by mbyron

I don't presume to know the great scheme (or the Great Scheme, if there is one). But I do agree with Keynes, that in the long run we are all dead. Hope that's on-topic. [/B]
"Is my team ploughing,
That I was used to drive
And hear the harness jingle
When I was man alive?"

Ay, the horses trample,
The harness jingles now;
No change though you lie under
The land you used to plough.

"Is football playing
Along the river shore,
With lads to chase the leather,
Now I stand up no more?"

Ay, the ball is flying,
The lads play heart and soul;
The goal stands up, the keeper
Stands up to keep the goal.

"Is my girl happy,
That I thought hard to leave,
And has she tired of weeping
As she lies down at eve?"

Ay, she lies down lightly,
She lies not down to weep,
Your girl is well contented.
Be still, my lad, and sleep.

"Is my friend hearty,
Now I am thin and pine,
And has he found to sleep in
A better bed than mine?"

Yes, lad, I lie easy,
I lie as lads would choose;
I cheer a dead man's sweetheart,
Never ask me whose.
__________________
GB
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old Tue Nov 22, 2005, 09:14pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Bend, In.
Posts: 2,192
Send a message via AIM to BigUmp56 Send a message via Yahoo to BigUmp56

Far from the churchyard dig his grave,
On some green mound beside the wave;

To westward, sea and sky alone,
And sunsets. Put a mossy stone,

With mortal name and date, a harp
And bunch of wild flowers, carven sharp;

Then leave it free to winds that blow,
And patient mosses creeping; slow,

And wandering wings, and footsteps rare
Of human creature pausing there.

--William Allingham.
__________________________________________________ ____________
__________________________________________________ ____________

Tim.
Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)  
Old Tue Nov 22, 2005, 09:18pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Aw, jeez, now it's gonna be the freakin' poetry thread!!!
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
  #39 (permalink)  
Old Tue Nov 22, 2005, 09:54pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Edinburg, TX
Posts: 1,212
Send a message via ICQ to Carl Childress
Quote:
Originally posted by GarthB
Quote:
Originally posted by mbyron

I don't presume to know the great scheme (or the Great Scheme, if there is one). But I do agree with Keynes, that in the long run we are all dead. Hope that's on-topic.
"Is my team ploughing,
That I was used to drive
And hear the harness jingle
When I was man alive?"

Ay, the horses trample,
The harness jingles now;
No change though you lie under
The land you used to plough.

"Is football playing
Along the river shore,
With lads to chase the leather,
Now I stand up no more?"

Ay, the ball is flying,
The lads play heart and soul;
The goal stands up, the keeper
Stands up to keep the goal.

"Is my girl happy,
That I thought hard to leave,
And has she tired of weeping
As she lies down at eve?"

Ay, she lies down lightly,
She lies not down to weep,
Your girl is well contented.
Be still, my lad, and sleep.

"Is my friend hearty,
Now I am thin and pine,
And has he found to sleep in
A better bed than mine?"

Yes, lad, I lie easy,
I lie as lads would choose;
I cheer a dead man's sweetheart,
Never ask me whose. [/B]
Housman's poetry is so spare, he's always put me in mind of Emily Dickinson. Let me change from death to a lighter vein:

A narrow Fellow in the Grass
Occasionally rides —
You may have met Him — did you not
His notice sudden is —

The Grass divides as with a Comb —
A spotted shaft is seen —
And then it closes at your feet
And opens further on —

He likes a Boggy Acre
A Floor too cool for Corn —
Yet when a Boy, and Barefoot —
I more than once at Noon

Have passed, I thought, a Whip lash
Unbraiding in the Sun
When stooping to secure it
It wrinkled, and was gone —

Several of Nature's People
I know, and they know me —
I feel for them a transport
Of cordiality —

But never met this Fellow
Attended, or alone
Without a tighter breathing
And Zero at the Bone —
It's my favorite short poem by an American author, perhaps because I grew up in the 40s where the "Whip lash" was real. I know first hand about "Zero at the Bone."
__________________
Papa C
My website
Reply With Quote
  #40 (permalink)  
Old Tue Nov 22, 2005, 10:17pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 4,222
I love Dickinson. Simple yet elegant...concise but not stingy...a wonderful control of "words".

I remember from the first time I read this how the first line "A narrow Fellow in the Grass" is such a broad tell, but the sibilance in line 4 is the cincher.
__________________
GB
Reply With Quote
  #41 (permalink)  
Old Tue Nov 22, 2005, 10:33pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 760
Quote:
Originally posted by Carl Childress
Quote:
Originally posted by WhatWuzThatBlue
Is "careful" a sentence in any language?

I felt you would appreciate the fact that you made a grammatical blunder, after all you have embraced the need to point out others' foibles.
Talk about ignorance. (Now that's a fragment.)

But "Careful" is an excellent imperative sentence. In such locutions, the subject is understood to be the person addressed:

"Careful!
"Watch out!"
"Sing!"
"Talk!"

There are other, one-word sentences that have an implied subject and verb:

"No!"
"Yes!"
"Maybe!"

Garth is not a friend of mine, as everyone knows. And he makes a few mistakes in his posts because of his eagerness and passion. But "Careful" is no mistake.

He's also teaching an honors Humanities class. Yesterday, they began work on 15th-century Italian art, architecture, music, painting, and sculpture.

What did you do yesterday?
Your examples were exclamations. His use of it was not. Imploring is not proclaiming vehemence, but I know that you knew that. I guess it was just another case of writing one thing but meaning another. Lah me!
Reply With Quote
  #42 (permalink)  
Old Tue Nov 22, 2005, 10:46pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 4,222
Quote:
Originally posted by WhatWuzThatBlue
Quote:
Originally posted by Carl Childress
Quote:
Originally posted by WhatWuzThatBlue
Is "careful" a sentence in any language?

I felt you would appreciate the fact that you made a grammatical blunder, after all you have embraced the need to point out others' foibles.
Talk about ignorance. (Now that's a fragment.)

But "Careful" is an excellent imperative sentence. In such locutions, the subject is understood to be the person addressed:

"Careful!
"Watch out!"
"Sing!"
"Talk!"

There are other, one-word sentences that have an implied subject and verb:

"No!"
"Yes!"
"Maybe!"

Garth is not a friend of mine, as everyone knows. And he makes a few mistakes in his posts because of his eagerness and passion. But "Careful" is no mistake.

He's also teaching an honors Humanities class. Yesterday, they began work on 15th-century Italian art, architecture, music, painting, and sculpture.

What did you do yesterday?
Your examples were exclamations. His use of it was not. Imploring is not proclaiming vehemence, but I know that you knew that. I guess it was just another case of writing one thing but meaning another. Lah me!
As I tried to explain before, imperatives need not be punctuated with exclamation points. I find it curious you still want to argue this. From your history, I would have deemed it beneath you.
__________________
GB
Reply With Quote
  #43 (permalink)  
Old Tue Nov 22, 2005, 10:58pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Edinburg, TX
Posts: 1,212
Send a message via ICQ to Carl Childress
Quote:
Originally posted by WhatWuzThatBlue
Quote:
Originally posted by Carl Childress
Quote:
Originally posted by WhatWuzThatBlue
Is "careful" a sentence in any language?

I felt you would appreciate the fact that you made a grammatical blunder, after all you have embraced the need to point out others' foibles.
Talk about ignorance. (Now that's a fragment.)

But "Careful" is an excellent imperative sentence. In such locutions, the subject is understood to be the person addressed:

"Careful!
"Watch out!"
"Sing!"
"Talk!"

There are other, one-word sentences that have an implied subject and verb:

"No!"
"Yes!"
"Maybe!"

Garth is not a friend of mine, as everyone knows. And he makes a few mistakes in his posts because of his eagerness and passion. But "Careful" is no mistake.

He's also teaching an honors Humanities class. Yesterday, they began work on 15th-century Italian art, architecture, music, painting, and sculpture.

What did you do yesterday?
Your examples were exclamations. His use of it was not. Imploring is not proclaiming vehemence, but I know that you knew that. I guess it was just another case of writing one thing but meaning another. Lah me!
Ph.D.: piled higher and deeper.

The last time I looked, a punctuation mark had nothing to do with the parse of a sentence.

The snitch is tied to a chair. Waddles up the fat enforcer. Slowly he leans down, down... close to the unfortunate's ear and softly whispers, the sibilants hissing in the still of the shadowy room: "Sing. Ssssing."
Do you suppose the guy in the chair is worrying about his tormentor's grammar?

"Sing." is a complete, imperative sentence, whether shouted or spoken softly. "Careful." belongs in the same category.

I was you, I'd stick to ignoring FED rules. That's something you seem to do well.

Oh, by the way: I've had three emails from readers who would like me to criticize for structure and mechanics one of your longer posts. So far, I have resisted temptation. But I am an inveterate sinner and backslider, so....
__________________
Papa C
My website
Reply With Quote
  #44 (permalink)  
Old Tue Nov 22, 2005, 11:00pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 760
Funny, but the King gave only examples that had those pesky puctuation marks.
Reply With Quote
  #45 (permalink)  
Old Tue Nov 22, 2005, 11:14pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Edinburg, TX
Posts: 1,212
Send a message via ICQ to Carl Childress
Quote:
Originally posted by WhatWuzThatBlue
Funny, but the King gave only examples that had those pesky puctuation marks.
It was my error not to include an imperative sentence that was not also emphatic. But that's not the point, which is:

Do you now understand that a complete sentence requires but one word?

Even adjectives and adverbs can be single-word sentences:

"Good."
"Awful."
"Fine."
"Worried."
"Proud."

A sentence is complete when there is a subject and a verb in an independent clause. That subject and verb may be stated ("When you won, how did you feel?" "I felt proud.") or implied ("Proud.").
__________________
Papa C
My website
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:31pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1