Threads about articles on the paid site

[LDUB]

Originally posted by DG
I don't care about future readers who read the archives and don't know any better.

So it is some kid's fault when he takes Wiederenelenders' bad advise?

How about Rollie stops writing terrible articles. No one would notice if Officiating.com didn't put out a baseball article on a day when it was supposed to. If Wiederalnders wants to write crap, then he should not be paid for it. It makes me mad that I am actually paying to read his articles. Someone should be paying me to read anything he writes. His articles wouldn't be interesting if they contained photos of naked women. The only reason anyone reads Wiederlander's articles is so we can discuss how terrible they are.