The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jun 06, 2005, 12:38pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 17
L Man - i was in C b/c 2 runners on...i tried to make my initial post as simple as possible, but I think I turned this into everything but simple.

Jerry - yes, its Dan. how did you know? did you hear the story? which Jerry are you...we worked together a few games earlier in the season?
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jun 06, 2005, 12:44pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 17
the tag was made with the runners front directly facing me, with the tag attempt being directly behind him lower then shoulder height. this took place about 1/2 way in the basepath between 1st and 2nd. even if i was in B, this still would have been hard to see b/c i'm closer to 2nd and this happened to my right facing the play.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jun 06, 2005, 12:45pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 286
Wink

Dan,
We worked yesterday in Chicago. There goes all the good things I said about you to the rest of the WBUA! ;-)

Jerry
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jun 06, 2005, 12:53pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Little Elm, TX (NW Dallas)
Posts: 4,047
Blue --- on the re-revised edition of this play, you still A) saw no tag, and B) don't seem positive the runner moved more than 3 feet away from a straight line between his original position and 2nd base. So next time, don't call an out. See an out, call an out. Don't see an out, you have nothing.

Usually, it's a lot easier to change SAFE into OUT if PU sees something differently than you did, than it is vice versa.

If you were POSITIVE on the 3-feet thing, you have an out, and no need at all to confer with PU.

As to the "fix". I suspect you should have gone with 1st and 2nd, but that depends very much on how close to 2nd the play was. If close, you might assume he wouldn't have thrown to 2nd if he missed the tag, and the play would have developed exactly the same - if so, then 2nd and 3rd is right.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jun 06, 2005, 01:10pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 17
mc - thats what i was looking for...the 'fix' response. great advice, easier to turn a safe into an out then vice versa. live and learn.

jerry - very funny! i see you recognized the story...now i get it. that was a nice email this morning. thanks for the kind words. it was a pleasure working with you. at least we had the lake to gaze at when there was no 'baseball' happening
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jun 06, 2005, 02:22pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,577
Quote:
Originally posted by Blue19
L Man - i was in C b/c 2 runners on...i tried to make my initial post as simple as possible, but I think I turned this into everything but simple.

ah, ok. That omission changed everything for me, i thot there was only R1, sorry

all you can do is get to the 'working area' as fast as possible and call what you see.
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jun 06, 2005, 02:47pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Newburgh NY
Posts: 1,822
Originally posted by mick

Originally posted by PeteBooth
BTW, your thread falls under the category of the "cardinal Sin" of umpiring.

Pete,
What does this mean?
Thanks.
mick


Mick even though it might be outdated, Papa C a while ago listed his infamous FAB V on when calls could be changed.

By referencing the phrase "cardinal Sin" I meant things umpires should simply not do as in this thread.

Pete Booth
__________________
Peter M. Booth
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jun 06, 2005, 03:28pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Houghton, U.P., Michigan
Posts: 9,953
Quote:
Originally posted by PeteBooth
Originally posted by mick

Originally posted by PeteBooth
BTW, your thread falls under the category of the "cardinal Sin" of umpiring.

Pete,
What does this mean?
Thanks.
mick


Mick even though it might be outdated, Papa C a while ago listed his infamous FAB V on when calls could be changed.

By referencing the phrase "cardinal Sin" I meant things umpires should simply not do as in this thread.

Pete Booth
Thanks Pete,
I think I get it.
Make the call and live with it?

Sorta like that old underarm deodorant commercial: "Never let 'em see you sweat"?

mick
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:50pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1