The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 14, 2005, 10:36pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 4,222
Re: Re: Mick,

Quote:
Originally posted by mick
Quote:
Originally posted by Tim C
You lost me on this one.
Tee,
The "live ball" requirement for the balk is missing in LL rules.
Trying to sell anything about requiring a live ball for a balk to most anyone, from your partner to the local Board of Directors, would be pretty darn tough.
There are not enough knowlegable umpires, managers, coaches working the kids' league to force Little League baseball to bring their manuals, casebooks and rule books up to snuff.

There's no written backup anywhere, ...I think.
mick
I know very little about LL so I sent this post to some umpires I know who work LL to fairly high levels as well as upper level real baseball. Here's one response I got:

"This is idiocy. The rule is the same. "

Interesting.
__________________
GB
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 14, 2005, 10:40pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Houghton, U.P., Michigan
Posts: 9,953
Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally posted by Rackster
Sorry guys,getting confused here....PU thought pitcher had ball and on pitching plate (shame on PU for being fooled?Obviously this is what causes the problem.)and called "Play".Isn't it now a live ball? Runner takes lead and is tagged out.Offensive team claims it is an illegal play,but PU lets call stand.That was his ruling,i'm saying if ball is made live,even mistakenly,its a balk.I understand what everyone is saying about "can't have a balk on a dead ball",but how should this situation be ruled.Does the PU just say "My mistake,runner is not out,pitcher take the ball and lets play!"?Is there a rule for a dead ball mistakenly being made live?
Rackster,
It is confusing ... in Little League.
1. PU calling "Play!" Makes the ball live by 3.12 and 5.02.
2. 5.11 says PU was not supposed to call "Play!" without ball in pitcher's hand.
3. 8.05 does not require a live ball.

No rule allows the fact that the pitcher did not have to ball cancel the fact that the PU called "Play!"

If I got deceived by the players in that situation, I would do what TEE and DG told me to do, "Get the ball to the pitcher and let's play."

He did it wrong and there was no one to tell him it was wrong.
mick












Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 14, 2005, 10:47pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Houghton, U.P., Michigan
Posts: 9,953
Smile Of course the rule's the same.

Quote:
Originally posted by GarthB
Quote:
Originally posted by mick
Quote:
Originally posted by Tim C
You lost me on this one.
Tee,
The "live ball" requirement for the balk is missing in LL rules.
Trying to sell anything about requiring a live ball for a balk to most anyone, from your partner to the local Board of Directors, would be pretty darn tough.
There are not enough knowlegable umpires, managers, coaches working the kids' league to force Little League baseball to bring their manuals, casebooks and rule books up to snuff.

There's no written backup anywhere, ...I think.
mick
I know very little about LL so I sent this post to some umpires I know who work LL to fairly high levels as well as upper level real baseball. Here's one response I got:

"This is idiocy. The rule is the same. "

Interesting.
Garth,
Maybe the other guys you asked are gonna find the rule, before they say, "Just is!"
mick
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 14, 2005, 10:51pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,729
Well,

Rich nailed it . . .

It doesn't matter even with the pure weak guys that work LL . . .

It still cannot be done.

I have no idea why LL umpires are so poor!

I don't get it.

I'll get outta here, Little League has NO value,

[Edited by Tim C on May 14th, 2005 at 11:58 PM]
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 14, 2005, 11:38pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Houghton, U.P., Michigan
Posts: 9,953
Re: Well,

Quote:
Originally posted by Tim C
Rich nailed it . . .

It doesn't matter even with the pure weak guys that work LL . . .

It still cannot be done.

I have no idea why LL umpires are so poor!

I don't get it.

I'll get outta here, Little League has NO value,

[Edited by Tim C on May 14th, 2005 at 11:58 PM]
I doubt that you mean that.
Little League umpires are mass produced with minimal training by Little League umpires with possibly some little league training.
The new umpires often learn on-the-job with little supervision. After a 1 or 2 hour clinic they show up behind the plate and right into the frying pan. These umpires are guided by coaches, players and fans perhaps more than they are supervised by their local umpire Trainers.

Regardless of the quality of ball, LL feeds the upper levels of baseball with players and umpires, maybe a college coach, ... and fans.
It does that quite well.

LL talks about citizenship, teamwork, sportsmanship and fair play, all good values for children.

The rule books are imperfect and seem to be designed to get newbee type parents, players and umpires onto the field with minimum confusion.

They keep it simple. They play ball.
mick


Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 14, 2005, 11:38pm
DG DG is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 4,022
Re: Well,

Quote:
Originally posted by Tim C
Rich nailed it . . .

It doesn't matter even with the pure weak guys that work LL . . .

It still cannot be done.

I have no idea why LL umpires are so poor!

I don't get it.

I'll get outta here, Little League has NO value,

[Edited by Tim C on May 14th, 2005 at 11:58 PM]
This is NOT a LL question. It is more fundamental than LL. It is baseball, all levels, all rules.
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old Sun May 15, 2005, 09:31am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 12
dead ball

What else are we supposed to allow during a dead ball?

Quote:
2. 5.11 says PU was not supposed to call "Play!" without ball in pitcher's hand.
3. 8.05 does not require a live ball.
502 also says While the ball is dead no actions (to long of a list to type) can be made except those that result from actions which occurred while the ball was alive.
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old Sun May 15, 2005, 11:40am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 768
[QUOTE]Originally posted by mick
Quote:
It is confusing ... in Little League.
1. PU calling "Play!" Makes the ball live by 3.12 and 5.02.
2. 5.11 says PU was not supposed to call "Play!" without ball in pitcher's hand.
3. 8.05 does not require a live ball.

No rule allows the fact that the pitcher did not have to ball cancel the fact that the PU called "Play!"
The Little League version of rules 3.12, 5.02, and 5.11 are IDENTICAL to the OBR version. There is no textual or interpretational difference in Little League, with respect to these rules.

As for "8.05 does not require a live ball," hardly any of the playing rules in the entire rule book EXPLICITLY say they are only applicable during a live ball. But almost all of the playing rules ARE only applicable when the ball is live. 8.05 is among those, in both OBR and Little League.

At age 13 and above, the LL balk rule is identical to OBR’s.

At 12 and below, balks become illegal pitches. In addition to a difference in penalty assessed (ball added to count instead of runners awarded a base) there are a few other quirky differences; however, whether it is applicable when the ball is not live is NOT one of those differences. The Little League IP should only be called when the infraction occurs while the ball is live.

Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old Sun May 15, 2005, 12:13pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 4,222
Re: Of course the rule's the same.

Quote:
Originally posted by mick
Quote:
Originally posted by GarthB
Quote:
Originally posted by mick
Quote:
Originally posted by Tim C
You lost me on this one.
Tee,
The "live ball" requirement for the balk is missing in LL rules.
Trying to sell anything about requiring a live ball for a balk to most anyone, from your partner to the local Board of Directors, would be pretty darn tough.
There are not enough knowlegable umpires, managers, coaches working the kids' league to force Little League baseball to bring their manuals, casebooks and rule books up to snuff.

There's no written backup anywhere, ...I think.
mick
I know very little about LL so I sent this post to some umpires I know who work LL to fairly high levels as well as upper level real baseball. Here's one response I got:

"This is idiocy. The rule is the same. "

Interesting.
Garth,
Maybe the other guys you asked are gonna find the rule, before they say, "Just is!"
mick
Mick:

Dave Hensley's post seemed to do just that, and politely.
__________________
GB
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old Sun May 15, 2005, 02:51pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Houghton, U.P., Michigan
Posts: 9,953
Thank you all for participating in this thread.

I certainly agree that an umpire calling, "Play!", does not make the ball live and that a ball must be live to balk.

But, it remains that given the rules provided by Little League, young umpires are not well-armed due to the editors of Little League publishings and training.

Based upon the play the sitch umpire goofed.
Base upon the information available to participants in Little League, a balk would be understood by following the rules provided.

Thanks.
mick





Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old Sun May 15, 2005, 03:39pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,729
OK,

Mick, do you agree that it is impossible to have a hidden ball trick after a dead ball under all rules codes?
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old Sun May 15, 2005, 06:44pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Houghton, U.P., Michigan
Posts: 9,953
Smile Re: OK,

Quote:
Originally posted by Tim C
Mick, do you agree that it is impossible to have a hidden ball trick after a dead ball under all rules codes?

Yes, TEE.
Thanks.
mick
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old Sun May 15, 2005, 08:25pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 768
Quote:
Originally posted by mick
But, it remains that given the rules provided by Little League, young umpires are not well-armed due to the editors of Little League publishings and training.
I researched the OBR and LL versions of each rule you cited, and they are identical, verbatim.

There are some LL rules for which your point is valid; the subject of this thread is, however, not one of them.
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old Sun May 15, 2005, 08:52pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Houghton, U.P., Michigan
Posts: 9,953
Quote:
Originally posted by Dave Hensley
Quote:
Originally posted by mick
But, it remains that given the rules provided by Little League, young umpires are not well-armed due to the editors of Little League publishings and training.
I researched the OBR and LL versions of each rule you cited, and they are identical, verbatim.

There are some LL rules for which your point is valid; the subject of this thread is, however, not one of them.
One final time on this thread.

13-, 16- or 20-yr.-old umpires do not have access to your information or resources. Their emphasis is on the paycheck and not the intricacies of Baseball's unwritten words. "Just is" is the rule provided in the discussion. and I can live with that as I have for many years. Why would you expect someone's kid as a brand new umpire know that stuff when it is not in the book, or to be as smart as you are by merely reading the rule book?

And, of course LL Baseball is based on OBR so they obviously should be the same or similar. The original play may not be properly determined base on the words of merely the Little League Baseball rule book. You must know more than the words in the book; you must know the "Just is", the common practice, the popular opinion.

It ain't in the book. Saying it's the same will not put it in the book.



mick



Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old Sun May 15, 2005, 09:31pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 329
Originally posted by Dave Hensley
I researched the OBR and LL versions of each rule you cited, and they are identical, verbatim.


Dave, the OBR and LL version are very similar, and the meaning of the rules is identical, but the two versions are not verbatim. The LL version has been altered to remove gender-specific references. For example, 5.11 (OBR) is:
"... play shall be resumed when the pitcher takes his place on the pitcher's plate with a new ball or the same ball in his possession..."
The 2005 LL version is:
"...play shall be resumed when the pitcher takes a position on the pitcher's plate with a new ball or the same ball in said pitcher's possesion..."

These differences are trivial for the discussion in this thread. But I wonder if you have a LL rulebook in which 5.11 is truly identical to the OBR? If so, what is its title?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:01pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1