Quote:
Originally posted by lc_huxter
I added no opinion on this email. Everything that is in CAPS is from the email. I am not sure why people are having a hard time understanding the email. In a nut shell it says this.
Home team which at the time had a runner on 3rd and 1st. The umpire called the runner safe on 3rd even though he did not touch home on his way back to 3rd base after the catch was made.
Visiting team which was on defense at the time asked for time and talked to the umpire about the situation and the umpire changed his called from safe to out. Which ended the game and the home team lost since it was the 3rd out.
Home team filed a protest at that moment based on the runner did not have to re-touch home on his way back to 3rd.
|
The home team should lose the protest -- the runner DID need to touch home on the way back.
Mon May 09, 2005, 09:52am
Threaded Mode
