|
ic_huxter
You say this is an email you received, then it seems you put your own thoughts into the quote.
"THIS IS WHERE THE VIOLATION IS BELIEVED TO BE, IT IS THEIR CONTENTION THAT OUR PLAYER HAD TO DOUBLE TAG HOME PLATE. ONCE WHEN HE CROSSED HOME RUNNING IN AND THEN AGAIN RUNNING STRAIGHT DOWN THE LINE TO RETURN TO THE THIRD BASE.
IT IS OUR CONTENTION THAT HE DID NOT NEED TO TAG HOME PLATE A SECOND TIME BUT ONLY RETURN TO THIRD BASE. AT THAT TIME IMMEDIATELY BEFORE THEIR TIME OUT THE SCORE WAS 12 TO 11 THEIR FAVOR, WE HAD TWO OUTS, A RUNNER ON FIRST AND THIRD".
Are these your opinions?
If they are then you are confusing us all!
Your player needed to retouch or at least come pretty damn close. You said he was heading toward the dugout. Which side?
I find it hard to believe he retouched or even came close in this situation.
Protestable? I don't know.
Was there a proper appeal?
__________________
"A picture is worth a thousand words".
|