![]() |
|
|||
Support this with a rule or ruling.
I said from the beginning that this might be a test, which implies that it also might not be. I said if the touch of 1B is indeed removed, which means I don't know whether it is or not. Of course there's nothing in the rule book about "removing the touch." I never said there was. as defined by the rules Well, it wouldn't be the first time that an interpretation contradicts the letter of the rules. I don't have an ax to grind either way, but I still don't think we have a firm answer as to whether or not a BR who touches 1B and then retreats toward home has to be tagged. I don't see an answer in J/R or PBUC or BRD. And I've heard logical reasoning both ways.
__________________
greymule More whiskey—and fresh horses for my men! Roll Tide! |
Bookmarks |
|
|