NFHS Forum has Disappeared-- Interpdbl ck

[FMadera]

Originally Posted by jkumpire

All these kind of situations are judgment calls to one extent or the other, since your response seem to me to be saying that if it is clear that the ball is going over and S4 is not trying to finish the attack, then the attack was finished and R was legally allowed to go across the plane of the net to attack the ball.

In my case, I made a judgment that it was not clear the ball was going over the net, in fact, I thought it would hit the net or be short. So in my view (HTBT), it was clear S4 was clearly OTN illegally.

Enjoy the post, and it is good to see you posting again.

Correct. I was just differentiating that you could have a penetrating block and it be legal. Your interpretation makes total sense in your scenario.