|
|||
That has always been my argument to accepting multiple offensive subs is protracted substitutions. The visiting teams starting lineup is entirely projected as not one of those players has yet participated under that definition. It is only a matter of time before a coach tries to change his lineup after the lineup is submitted and argues it should not count as a substitution because those players have not yet participated.
|
|
|||
Now there is some clarification (from an email I received, I assume this is a NFHS comment):
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Tom |
|
|||
Quote:
Now you are going to have some real intelligent folks try to "remove" a player from a line-up before providing a substitution. Are these people that dense that they do not understand that since only one player can occupy a slot in the line-up the providing a substitute effectively removes the player in that spot from the line-up? How about something as simple as, "All substitutions or changes are effective immediately upon submission to and acceptance of the umpire" ? End of story. No maybes, what ifs or buts, all aspects of the game take place in the present, not the future.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Unsporting Acts | tomegun | Basketball | 33 | Fri Dec 25, 2009 02:28pm |
Unfair tactics / unfair acts / unsportsmanlike conduct | Barcelona | Football | 12 | Fri Jun 06, 2008 11:01pm |
Manager Acts Like a Dipstick, I'm Sorry to Say | jkumpire | Baseball | 107 | Mon Apr 23, 2007 08:06pm |
Inappropriate Acts | ronny mulkey | Basketball | 3 | Mon Oct 16, 2006 07:51am |
Disconcerting acts or words | tempestos | Football | 9 | Tue Oct 18, 2005 03:13pm |