The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jul 29, 2015, 04:20pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,340
Quote:
Originally Posted by CecilOne View Post
Then each "starter" needs to be reported separately as they come to bat.
That has always been my argument to accepting multiple offensive subs is protracted substitutions. The visiting teams starting lineup is entirely projected as not one of those players has yet participated under that definition. It is only a matter of time before a coach tries to change his lineup after the lineup is submitted and argues it should not count as a substitution because those players have not yet participated.
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old Thu Aug 06, 2015, 08:17am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: PA
Posts: 537
Now there is some clarification (from an email I received, I assume this is a NFHS comment):

Quote:
Projected Substitute: In Rule 3-3-3 there is a statement that "projected substitutions are not permitted" however, projected substitutes are not currently defined in the Rules Book.

Therefore the creation of rule 2-57-4, NEW: A projected substitute is the act of entering a substitute without first removing a player from that position in the lineup.

This definition has been added because there are situations where coaches attempt to make a substitution for the upcoming half inning on defense while the player being replaced is still on offense. This is illegal. The coach must first remove the player(s) from the lineup and then enter the substitute(s) name(s) and numbers).

Note: Multiple substitutions on offense is not considered projected substitutes as long as the coach removes the person(s) being substituted for and then enters the names and numbers of those players entering the lineup. (3-3-2 and 3-3-3).
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old Thu Aug 06, 2015, 08:30am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,340
Mind if I ask where that email came from? I agree with it but seems to be in direct conflict with the previous NFHS statement that came out about not immediately participating.
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old Thu Aug 06, 2015, 09:59am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
Quote:
Originally Posted by RKBUmp View Post
Mind if I ask where that email came from? I agree with it but seems to be in direct conflict with the previous NFHS statement that came out about not immediately participating.
It is great if they are backing off a bit, but it does conflict with the explanation of the rule change on the NFHS web site,

Quote:
Rule 2-57-4 has been added because there are situations where coaches attempt to make multiple substitutions on offense that may not happen immediately. This is an inappropriate practice on offense because players can only be substituted prior to their immediate scheduled at-bat. Therefore, coaches may only substitute for the immediate player at bat.
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old Thu Aug 06, 2015, 11:42am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Slick View Post
Now there is some clarification (from an email I received, I assume this is a NFHS comment):
What a roundabout bullshit explanation and/or interpretation.

Now you are going to have some real intelligent folks try to "remove" a player from a line-up before providing a substitution. Are these people that dense that they do not understand that since only one player can occupy a slot in the line-up the providing a substitute effectively removes the player in that spot from the line-up?

How about something as simple as, "All substitutions or changes are effective immediately upon submission to and acceptance of the umpire" ? End of story. No maybes, what ifs or buts, all aspects of the game take place in the present, not the future.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Unsporting Acts tomegun Basketball 33 Fri Dec 25, 2009 02:28pm
Unfair tactics / unfair acts / unsportsmanlike conduct Barcelona Football 12 Fri Jun 06, 2008 11:01pm
Manager Acts Like a Dipstick, I'm Sorry to Say jkumpire Baseball 107 Mon Apr 23, 2007 08:06pm
Inappropriate Acts ronny mulkey Basketball 3 Mon Oct 16, 2006 07:51am
Disconcerting acts or words tempestos Football 9 Tue Oct 18, 2005 03:13pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:33am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1