The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 04, 2015, 01:48am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,241
Hands part of the bat.

Here is one front tonight's WCWS game. Hailey Wagner, Michigan's Pitcher/DP hit a pop up on the infield. From the live play I thought the ball hit her on the hands and was popped up off her hand. She certainly acted like it hit her hand as she was shaking her hands going back to the dugout.

If a player swings and the ball hits off her hands, isn't this supposed to be a dead ball strike, rather than a pop out.

Overall I thought the umpiring was pretty decent this weekend, although the umpires strike zone seem a bit wide tonight. It was wide for both teams though.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 04, 2015, 07:41am
Stirrer of the Pot
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Lowcountry, SC
Posts: 2,380
Quote:
Originally Posted by chapmaja View Post
Here is one front tonight's WCWS game. Hailey Wagner, Michigan's Pitcher/DP hit a pop up on the infield. From the live play I thought the ball hit her on the hands and was popped up off her hand. She certainly acted like it hit her hand as she was shaking her hands going back to the dugout.

If a player swings and the ball hits off her hands, isn't this supposed to be a dead ball strike, rather than a pop out.
You are correct. But for an umpire to tell that the ball hit the hand instead of the bat is quite difficult when it appears that the ball came off the handle on the swing. Just going by how the batter reacts is not enough to convince me that it definitely hit the batter's hands; she could be faking it to avoid the sure out. I would need to hear the sound of the contact as well.

As a side, some umpires debate this whole "ball hit hand then bat" or vice versa when a batter doesn't swing at an inside pitch and the ball contacts the batter's hand and the bat. I personally don't see how you can physically tell which came first, and I tend to give the batter the benefit of the doubt and send her to first base. But there are umpires who will argue that the ball hit the bat first and then hit the hand, and rule it a foul ball.
__________________
"Let's face it. Umpiring is not an easy or happy way to make a living. In the abuse they suffer, and the pay they get for it, you see an imbalance that can only be explained by their need to stay close to a game they can't resist." -- Bob Uecker
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 04, 2015, 10:45am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manny A View Post
You are correct. But for an umpire to tell that the ball hit the hand instead of the bat is quite difficult when it appears that the ball came off the handle on the swing. Just going by how the batter reacts is not enough to convince me that it definitely hit the batter's hands; she could be faking it to avoid the sure out. I would need to hear the sound of the contact as well.

As a side, some umpires debate this whole "ball hit hand then bat" or vice versa when a batter doesn't swing at an inside pitch and the ball contacts the batter's hand and the bat. I personally don't see how you can physically tell which came first, and I tend to give the batter the benefit of the doubt and send her to first base. But there are umpires who will argue that the ball hit the bat first and then hit the hand, and rule it a foul ball.
Usually it's the sound. You can hear it come off metal, or you can hear that slappy sound from it coming off hand. If I hear metal, it hit bat - and if it hit both, based on physics alone, it almost definitely hit bat first.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 04, 2015, 11:40am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by chapmaja View Post
Here is one front tonight's WCWS game. Hailey Wagner, Michigan's Pitcher/DP hit a pop up on the infield. From the live play I thought the ball hit her on the hands and was popped up off her hand. She certainly acted like it hit her hand as she was shaking her hands going back to the dugout.

If a player swings and the ball hits off her hands, isn't this supposed to be a dead ball strike, rather than a pop out.

Overall I thought the umpiring was pretty decent this weekend, although the umpires strike zone seem a bit wide tonight. It was wide for both teams though.
Maybe a stinger. If it really did hit her hand I think there would have been more of a fuss.
__________________
Rich Ives
Different does not equate to wrong
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 04, 2015, 10:17pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,241
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Ives View Post
Maybe a stinger. If it really did hit her hand I think there would have been more of a fuss.
I agree. Considering the way Coach Hutchins was fussing most of the series I was thinking the same way.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hands part of the ball tref Basketball 5 Wed Jan 26, 2011 04:40pm
Not only are the hands part of the bat . . . greymule Softball 10 Thu Aug 17, 2006 06:35pm
Hands are part of the bat?? NSABlue Softball 12 Mon Jun 06, 2005 01:51pm
Hands not part of the bat Chess Ref Softball 7 Fri Apr 08, 2005 09:51am
Hands part of bat FLORIDA UMP Baseball 13 Sun Apr 21, 2002 08:46pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:28am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1